From: Beav on


"Stephen!" <NO(a)spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D86AA2DC1164smvsmv(a)69.16.185.250...
> "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote in news:UzXLn.10507
> $9A2.6054(a)hurricane:
>
>>> Though abhorrent, it is real. This is an old one, at least 6 to 7
>>> years. I remember it going around in an e-mail. Folks are different,
>>> 'round the world. ;-)
>>
>> If you REALLY believe that it's real, I've got a nice bridge here.....
>
>
> It's real... Try this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNQIb4MWo
>
> Now... Unless yer gonna try to say that was done by someone "...pretty
> handy with the editing suite" you might want to apologize to Snag and
> mayner.

Well as that video has been removed, I'll stick with what my own two eyes
told me. First off, a two year old couldn't blow out more smoke than he
sucks in, even if he's been smoking since birth and he "does" that on two
occasions, but the whole video is on a loop so it looks like he's puffing
away for ages.

He wouldn't have the coordination to wrangle the cig like he's supposedly
doing either.

It's as obvious an edit as it's possible to make. But then again, I don't
believe the twin towers were blown down in a conspiracy either.

--
Beav


From: Snag on
Beav wrote:
> "Stephen!" <NO(a)spam.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9D86AA2DC1164smvsmv(a)69.16.185.250...
>> "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote in news:UzXLn.10507
>> $9A2.6054(a)hurricane:
>>
>>>> Though abhorrent, it is real. This is an old one, at least 6 to 7
>>>> years. I remember it going around in an e-mail. Folks are
>>>> different, 'round the world. ;-)
>>>
>>> If you REALLY believe that it's real, I've got a nice bridge
>>> here.....
>>
>>
>> It's real... Try this:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNQIb4MWo
>>
>> Now... Unless yer gonna try to say that was done by someone
>> "...pretty handy with the editing suite" you might want to apologize
>> to Snag and mayner.
>
> Well as that video has been removed, I'll stick with what my own two
> eyes told me. First off, a two year old couldn't blow out more smoke
> than he sucks in, even if he's been smoking since birth and he "does"
> that on two occasions, but the whole video is on a loop so it looks
> like he's puffing away for ages.
>
> He wouldn't have the coordination to wrangle the cig like he's
> supposedly doing either.
>
> It's as obvious an edit as it's possible to make. But then again, I
> don't believe the twin towers were blown down in a conspiracy either.
>
> --
> Beav

I don't know if it's real or fake , and don't care . My point was that it's
sick to be amused by it .

--
Snag
"90 FLHTCU "Strider"
'39 WLDD "PopCycle"
BS 132/SENS/DOF


From: Beav on


"Snag" <snag_one(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jWeMn.25190$mi.10879(a)newsfe01.iad...
> Beav wrote:
>> "Stephen!" <NO(a)spam.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9D86AA2DC1164smvsmv(a)69.16.185.250...
>>> "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote in news:UzXLn.10507
>>> $9A2.6054(a)hurricane:
>>>
>>>>> Though abhorrent, it is real. This is an old one, at least 6 to 7
>>>>> years. I remember it going around in an e-mail. Folks are
>>>>> different, 'round the world. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> If you REALLY believe that it's real, I've got a nice bridge
>>>> here.....
>>>
>>>
>>> It's real... Try this:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNQIb4MWo
>>>
>>> Now... Unless yer gonna try to say that was done by someone
>>> "...pretty handy with the editing suite" you might want to apologize
>>> to Snag and mayner.
>>
>> Well as that video has been removed, I'll stick with what my own two
>> eyes told me. First off, a two year old couldn't blow out more smoke
>> than he sucks in, even if he's been smoking since birth and he "does"
>> that on two occasions, but the whole video is on a loop so it looks
>> like he's puffing away for ages.
>>
>> He wouldn't have the coordination to wrangle the cig like he's
>> supposedly doing either.
>>
>> It's as obvious an edit as it's possible to make. But then again, I
>> don't believe the twin towers were blown down in a conspiracy either.
>>
>> --
>> Beav
>
> I don't know if it's real or fake , and don't care . My point was that
> it's sick to be amused by it .

It would be if it was real, but as it's a spoof/joke, it's "supposed" to be
amusing. Can't say it amused me, but to each his own I guess.

--
Beav



From: Robert Bolton on
On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:37:34 -0500, "Snag" <snag_one(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>Beav wrote:
>> "Stephen!" <NO(a)spam.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9D86AA2DC1164smvsmv(a)69.16.185.250...
>>> "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote in news:UzXLn.10507
>>> $9A2.6054(a)hurricane:
>>>
>>>>> Though abhorrent, it is real. This is an old one, at least 6 to 7
>>>>> years. I remember it going around in an e-mail. Folks are
>>>>> different, 'round the world. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> If you REALLY believe that it's real, I've got a nice bridge
>>>> here.....
>>>
>>>
>>> It's real... Try this:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNQIb4MWo
>>>
>>> Now... Unless yer gonna try to say that was done by someone
>>> "...pretty handy with the editing suite" you might want to apologize
>>> to Snag and mayner.
>>
>> Well as that video has been removed, I'll stick with what my own two
>> eyes told me. First off, a two year old couldn't blow out more smoke
>> than he sucks in, even if he's been smoking since birth and he "does"
>> that on two occasions, but the whole video is on a loop so it looks
>> like he's puffing away for ages.
>>
>> He wouldn't have the coordination to wrangle the cig like he's
>> supposedly doing either.
>>
>> It's as obvious an edit as it's possible to make. But then again, I
>> don't believe the twin towers were blown down in a conspiracy either.
>>
>> --
>> Beav
>
>I don't know if it's real or fake , and don't care . My point was that it's
>sick to be amused by it .

Oh I don't know. Would it be sick to find it amusing when Mo hits
Larry in the head with a hammer?

Robert
From: Beav on


"Henry" <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote in message
news:hu2tvr$fj6$3(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu...
> Beav wrote:
>>
>
>> It's as obvious an edit as it's possible to make. But then again, I don't
>> believe the twin towers were blown down in a conspiracy either.
>
> Good on you.

Indeed, I marked your post "Delete"

--
Beav