From: Twibil on
On Aug 9, 8:16 pm, "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > Wrong. You really, really, really do bore me to death.
>
> > Idiot, if I actually bored you then you wouldn't even bother reading
> > my posts, much less would you take the time to answer every single one
> > with an attempted put-down. You'd simply ignore me; QED.
>
> But your poison permeates at least two NG's that I frequent and it's
> impossible to ignore the stench...

Yeah. Sure. (Liar.) Thing is, Krusty, a good creative lie is often
impossible to detect and can often be entertaining as well: in fact,
there's an entire category of 'em called "Texas Lies" in which both
the teller and the listener *know* the whole thing is a fiction, and
it's done strictly for the humorous effect of the wild exaggeration.

But your lies aren't creative -because you don't have a creative bone
in your body- and they aren't entertaining because whatever sense of
wit or style you might have once possesed shriveled long ago under the
blowtorch of your universal contempt for everyone and everything that
you see as being better off than yourself. (Meaning just about
everything in possession of a notochord.)

In short, your lies are -and always have been- stupid, obvious, and so
constant over the years that you've put yourself into the un-enviable
position of the little boy who cried "WOLF!": Even should you slip up
and accidentally let a bit of truth slip into one of your vitrolic
screeds, nobody in their right minds would believe you anyway given
your past history.

And the sweet part of this is that you did it entirely to yourself,
just exactly as you've ruined your whole life while blaming your utter
failures on everyone but yourself.
From: ? on
On Aug 9, 11:57 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 8:16 pm, "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> > But your poison permeates at least two NG's that I frequent and it's
> > impossible to ignore the stench...

> And the sweet part of this is that you did it entirely to yourself,
> just exactly as you've ruined your whole life while blaming your utter
> failures on everyone but yourself.

So. Why don't you just get in bed with Rod Gobbling Don? The two of
you are self-righteous bigot clones and would be perfect lovers.
From: S'mee on
On Aug 10, 6:27 am, "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 11:57 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 9, 8:16 pm, "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > But your poison permeates at least two NG's that I frequent and it's
> > > impossible to ignore the stench...
> > And the sweet part of this is that you did it entirely to yourself,
> > just exactly as you've ruined your whole life while blaming your utter
> > failures on everyone but yourself.
>
> So. Why don't you just get in bed with Rod Gobbling Don? The two of
> you are self-righteous bigot clones and would be perfect lovers.

IRONY...from a racist child abuser. Amusing when he actually doesn't
get his own irony...and stays home avoiding Strugis.
From: Futility Man on
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:04:21 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:

>> park and there are stiff
>>penalties for disturbing the dirt or plants there.
>
>Really? OK.

The north side of the road is the border for the Great Smoky Mountains NP. When
a tree falls from that side of the road, they must get special permission to
remove it. They're allowed to cut up what's actually in the road, but must have
a permit to remove the rest of the tree. It's stupid, but it's the law.

The next time that rumor floats through about the Dragon is going to be
"straightened" or made into an Interstate (motorway), remember the Park. It's
never going to happen.

>* but then I suppose you only get one chance before the rider's gone

Exactly. Not in my case though. I reversed and went past each photog three
times. On the second and third passes, I sounded my horn to let them know I was
coming into view. The loudest thing on my bike is the valve train, they don't
usually hear me coming. I sound like George Jetson's car.

> someone who desperately wants a pic of 'me on my bike' isn't going
>to be discerning.

If I wanted artistic, I'd set somebody up and get that. I don't care enough to
pay $6 per picture for any of these, so the proofs are all I'll ever see. It
would be easy enough to get the full pictures and photoshop the backgrounds but
I really can't work up that much enthusiasm.

>Itr's not hard to freeze spokes at any speed if you use a fast enough
>shutter speed.

Even at the speed I was going, 40 or so, the tread of my tires was plainly
visible, as were the scrubbed-away portions of my boot soles.

I have some pictures I shot when I was working as a guard at Laguna Seca back in
1980. Almost everything on the track was a two stroke and using 1/1000 was not
enough to freeze the spokes of the guys coming out of the hairpin and carrying
the front wheel down the long straight. I was using a Canon AE-1 (pre-program),
that was the fastest speed I had.

There were some people there from Honda of Japan. It was rumored they had a
couple of bikes with square pistons. Everything was kept behind tarps and even
though I was guarding the pits that day, I never got a glimpse of anything but
the bikes as they hit the track. Everything in their pit stall was carefully
screened off. Neither bike made a full lap before the engine seized.

They packed everything up and left. Later we realized what we had actually
witnessed but at the time we didn't have a clue. Everything I find in print
says they started working on these engines in 81, but I beg to differ.

--
Futility Man
From: tomorrow on
On Aug 10, 11:01 am, Futility Man <n...(a)futile.org> wrote:

> .... I was working as a guard at Laguna Seca back in 1980.
 
> There were some people there from Honda of Japan.  It was rumored they had a
> couple of bikes with square pistons.  Everything was kept behind tarps and even
> though I was guarding the pits that day, I never got a glimpse of anything but
> the bikes as they hit the track.  Everything in their pit stall was carefully
> screened off.  Neither bike made a full lap before the engine seized.  
>
> They packed everything up and left.  Later we realized what we had actually
> witnessed but at the time we didn't have a clue.  Everything I find in print
> says they started working on these engines in 81, but I beg to differ.

Now *that* is an interesting tidbit!