From: Futility Man on
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:36:32 +1200, BrianNZ <brian(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote:

>Can you imagine Kansas, USA using metric measurements in 1895!?

Actually in that instance, the "metre" was probably equivalent to the "square"
used in roofing measurement, or 100 square feet and not a modern meter.

The boards were sized so one linear foot was also one square foot to make the
calculation come out evenly. 12" wide boards were not at all uncommon 115 years
ago.

--
Futility Man
From: John Stafford on
In article <82h356ll2j6bkjpb0ec9i55gpub3p8np92(a)4ax.com>,
tripletask(a)gmail..com wrote:

> Can you imagine a bunch of negroes attempting this test?

I can imagine you trying to take the test and wetting your pants.
From: Rob Kleinschmidt on
On Jul 29, 1:53 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote:
> In article <82h356ll2j6bkjpb0ec9i55gpub3p8n...(a)4ax.com>,
>
>  tripletask(a)gmail..com wrote:
> > Can you imagine a bunch of negroes attempting this test?
>
> I can imagine you trying to take the test and wetting your pants.

Agreed. Betcha the OP also can't pass the test
taken as an open book exam.

For the benefit of tripletask, "open book" means that
you're allowed to consult textbooks while taking the
test.
From: S'mee on
On Jul 29, 4:10 pm, mayner <jeffmay...(a)USCNumberOne.com> wrote:

>
> Something smells fishy.   ;-)-

I told you not to take that gal to a hotel or any where else for that
matter. That dish...ain't no dish.
From: tripletask on
Here is a link to the book/test in question.

http://www.daybrown.org/farmath/farmath.htm