9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: BrianNZ on 3 May 2010 17:32 Henry wrote: > >>> *Really* pathetic is when someone believes in an obviously impossible >>> cartoon fairy tale, and when challenged to explain how he can believe >>> in something that's obviously impossible, he either runs away confused >>> and frustrated, or disgraces himself further by spewing even more >>> silly, childish drivel. That'd be you, btw. <chuckle> > > BrianNZ wrote >> *Really*? > Henry wrote: > Definitely. BrianNZ wrote >> 1. What type of demolition material was used to bring down the Twin >> Towers? > Henry wrote: > First let's agree that WTC7 was demolished, <snip a cut'n'pate that had nothing to do with the Twin Towers being demolished> > BrianNZ wrote , which was snipped by henry in his reply...... > 1. What type of demolition material was used to bring down the Twin Towers? > > 2. Where did they get it from? > > 3. How much (as in how many tons) would it have taken? > > 4. How many people would it have taken to plant these explosives? > > 5. How did they manage to plant these explosives without anyone seeing/hearing them? > > You have supplied your cartoon fairy tale, now explain the logistics. try using your own words (as in no cut'n'pastes') and notice I'm talking about the 'Twin Towers'. > > Lets see if *you* can explain something thats obviously impossible without disgracing yourself by spewing more drivel...... > > <looking into the future I see a snipped, taken out of context reply of cut'n'pastes that fails to cover the questions and winds up being about WTC7> > As you can see henry, my prediction was 100% accurate.......
From: S'mee on 4 May 2010 10:48 On May 4, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: Hey Karl Marx...you are SO last millenium and your corrupt and unworkable dogma has been flushed. So get a life, maybe start running a hotdog cart in times square, hang out with all the other retards like yourself.
From: Henry on 6 May 2010 10:54 Ironhead amused it many betters with the following insanity: > Henry proved: >> And of course, ironhead is "arguing" against both government >> hired NIST employees and 9-11 Truth experts who all agree that >> WTC7 did, in fact, drop at the rate of free fall. ironhead is >> quite clearly as insane as it is dead wrong. As always, here's >> hard proof. ironhead will be unable to address this proof with >> anything but more of its insanity and lies. As we've all seen, >> ironhead, like most blind faith followers of the government's >> impossible 9-11 conspiracy theory, *never* posts any facts, >> evidence, research, or references. There's a reason for that...<g> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw >> Videos from: http://www.911speakout.org/ > It is not even subject to dispute that the collapse of WTC7 was 16+ > seconds, Hankie. It simply isn't. Well, not if you're deluded, insane, and you "think" that NIST along with thousands of 9-11 Truth experts know less than one lone usenet nut job - a lone nut job whose kook rants are consistently proved dead wrong and can't cite even *one* shred of evidence or source that agrees with its moronic lies and kooky conspiracy rants. Thanks for proving my point, nut job... <chuckle> http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 6 May 2010 10:55 Ironhead amused its many betters with the following moronic kook lies: > On May 5, 7:01 am, Henry articulately proved: >> And of course, ironhead is "arguing" against both government >> hired NIST employees and 9-11 Truth experts who all agree that >> WTC7 did, in fact, drop at the rate of free fall. As always, >> here's hard, irrefutable proof. >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw >> Videos from: http://www.911speakout.org/ > They do no such thing, of course, not in dispute, Hankie. What's not in dispute, thanks to you, is that followers of the government's physically impossible 9-11 cartoon conspiracy theory fairy tale are so deluded, so incredibly ignorant, so simple minded, and spew many stupid, blatant lies that they come across as insane. That's no coincidence, btw. Thanks for proving my point again ironhead... <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 7 May 2010 09:03
BrianNZ wrote: > What was my lie? The fact that you can't answer that simple question > shows how far you are prepared to go to con yourself that you are right > and supply yourself with your own 'proof'. I've quoted your lie several times. Here it is again. You said, "henry will never supply you with any answer that he can't cut'n'paste." I almost always answer directly with my own words, just as I am now. However, unlike you, I also support my claims with links to hard evidence and expert research. The lie quoted above, like your physically impossible cartoon conspiracy theory, is very easily refuted, and very silly. Like most magic fire conspiracy theorists, you refuse to address the hard evidence and expert research, and instead, change the subject, spew silly lies, and/or obsess over me instead. Now, please try to stop lying, stop your pathetic weaseling, and try to address the facts and hard evidence. Tell us how you "think" WTC7 could suddenly drop at the rate of free fall why simultaneously bending, crushing and breaking up its steel frame - a steel frame that was engineered to support several times its own weight and withstand hurricane force wind loads and mild earth quakes. Do you understand that free fall can only occur when a falling object encounters no significant resistance? Tell us how you imagine all the steel columns lost all their strength in an instant. We know that gradual, random weakening from minor office fires can't cause that, and we also know that most of the steel frame wasn't even exposed to fire. Proof of free fall is documented below. http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw Videos from: http://www.911speakout.org/ -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |