|
From: doetnietcomputeren on 20 Mar 2010 17:15 On 2010-03-20 20:54:26 +0100, "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> said: >>>> I'm wondering what employer would take me on knowing that I'm going >>>> to be out of action fairly soon when I have this kidney op. I'm not >>>> holding out much hope for the near future tbh >>> >>> There's always the option of not telling them about your personal >>> health issues. >> >> And then be sacked for not disclosing it at the interview - yeah right! > > I'm not sure that anyone can use your medical information as a reason for > not employing you, Well not, not legally (unless it would be a safety issue), but they wouldn't actually tell him that, they'd just find a more suitable candidate. > so why should it matter?. I'm not even sure if they > actually have a right to ask, but I do know that I wouldn't tell them unless > they asked a specific question and then told me why they wanted to know. By which time you'll have dropped down the list of suitable candidates. -- Dnc
From: darsy on 20 Mar 2010 18:02 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:56:56 -0000, "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: > >"darsy" <darsy(a)sticky.co.uk> wrote in message >news:arg9q5ltkoq8alira61bue4ae0vmkj0eqr(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:38:15 -0000, "Beav" >> <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: > >>>> losers that have to result to using assemblers just can't hack binary >>>> machine code. >>> >>>English seems to be a bit of a problem too :-) >> >> why would that be a problem? > >Result and all without bait too. (Re-read your last sentence) it's entrierly possible I've gone mad. -- d.
From: Beav on 21 Mar 2010 16:17 "doetnietcomputeren" <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:2010032022155780278-doesnotcompute(a)gmailcom... > On 2010-03-20 20:54:26 +0100, "Beav" <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> > said: > >>>>> I'm wondering what employer would take me on knowing that I'm going >>>>> to be out of action fairly soon when I have this kidney op. I'm not >>>>> holding out much hope for the near future tbh >>>> >>>> There's always the option of not telling them about your personal >>>> health issues. >>> >>> And then be sacked for not disclosing it at the interview - yeah right! >> >> I'm not sure that anyone can use your medical information as a reason for >> not employing you, > > Well not, not legally (unless it would be a safety issue), but they > wouldn't actually tell him that, they'd just find a more suitable > candidate. That's the ewhole point isn't it. Lozzo's concerned that if he doesn't tell them, they'll sack him if they find out and yet if they find out before they hire him, they just won't hire him in the firsdt place. I'd keep my gob shut and if they kicked up a fuss when (if) they found out, I'd consider lawyering up and fighting. > >> so why should it matter?. I'm not even sure if they >> actually have a right to ask, but I do know that I wouldn't tell them >> unless >> they asked a specific question and then told me why they wanted to know. > > By which time you'll have dropped down the list of suitable candidates. Actually *I* wouldn't, coz I've not worked for anyone (so no interviews) since the early 80's and I'm not about to start now. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
From: Beav on 21 Mar 2010 16:19
"darsy" <darsy(a)sticky.co.uk> wrote in message news:vchaq55jebt4g9a7or1ji734aqcb5n6um2(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:56:56 -0000, "Beav" > <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: > >> >>"darsy" <darsy(a)sticky.co.uk> wrote in message >>news:arg9q5ltkoq8alira61bue4ae0vmkj0eqr(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:38:15 -0000, "Beav" >>> <beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: >> >>>>> losers that have to result to using assemblers just can't hack binary >>>>> machine code. >>>> >>>>English seems to be a bit of a problem too :-) >>> >>> why would that be a problem? >> >>Result and all without bait too. (Re-read your last sentence) > > it's entrierly possible I've gone mad. Pull up a chair. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |