Prev: It does not fill you with confidence when...
Next: ZEN
From: Tosspot on 26 May 2010 03:56 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8704489.stm Got caught by the speed camera right at the end as well! Going to cost...
From: TOG on 26 May 2010 04:13 On 26 May, 08:56, Tosspot <Frank.Le...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8704489.stm > > Got caught by the speed camera right at the end as well! Going to cost.... Huge fine, ban, re-test, possibly a short sharp custodial too....
From: darsy on 26 May 2010 04:15 On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:17 +0100, Tosspot <Frank.Leake(a)gmail.com> wrote: >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8704489.stm > >Got caught by the speed camera right at the end as well! Going to cost... nothing about that looked particularly dodgy though. -- d.
From: Colin Irvine on 26 May 2010 04:25 On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:17 +0100, Tosspot squeezed out the following: >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8704489.stm > >Got caught by the speed camera right at the end as well! Going to cost... Indeed. I wonder which is deemed to be worse - 111mph in a 50 or 140+ in a 70. -- Colin Irvine ZZR1400 BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5 http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
From: CT on 26 May 2010 04:27
darsy wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:17 +0100, Tosspot <Frank.Leake(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8704489.stm > > > > Got caught by the speed camera right at the end as well! Going to > > cost... > > nothing about that looked particularly dodgy though. My thoughts exactly. The road was pretty clear by the time he got up to 140-odd and even then it was only for a few seconds. -- Chris |