Prev: FOAK: Changing MP3 Frequency.
Next: XT660R
From: darsy on 23 Apr 2010 03:18 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0100, "Nige" <deead(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Krusty wrote: >> I've got an MP3 which I want to change to around 22Khz, thus making it >> inaudible to humans. Is such a thing possible without buying fancy >> software? I've got GoldWave but can't figure out how to do it. > >I want something that makes cats explode but is hamrless to >rabbits.....anyone? that's madness - rabbits taste far nicer than cats. -- d.
From: CT on 23 Apr 2010 03:41 darsy wrote: > that's madness - rabbits taste far nicer than cats. You know this as a fact? I mean, rabbit is lovely[1], but I've never tasted cat... [1] I have one in the freezer, ready to make into a nice stew. -- Chris
From: Champ on 23 Apr 2010 04:00 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0100, "Nige" <deead(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Krusty wrote: >> I've got an MP3 which I want to change to around 22Khz, thus making it >> inaudible to humans. Is such a thing possible without buying fancy >> software? I've got GoldWave but can't figure out how to do it. >I want something that makes cats explode but is hamrless to >rabbits.....anyone? And I want the same thing, with reversed polarity, to make rabbits explode but is harmless to cats. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: stephen.packer on 23 Apr 2010 04:03 Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0100, "Nige" <deead(a)btinternet.com> > wrote: > > >Krusty wrote: > >> I've got an MP3 which I want to change to around 22Khz, thus making it > >> inaudible to humans. Is such a thing possible without buying fancy > >> software? I've got GoldWave but can't figure out how to do it. > > >I want something that makes cats explode but is hamrless to > >rabbits.....anyone? > > And I want the same thing, with reversed polarity, to make rabbits > explode but is harmless to cats. Printed.
From: darsy on 23 Apr 2010 04:16
On 23 Apr 2010 07:41:26 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: >darsy wrote: > >> that's madness - rabbits taste far nicer than cats. > >You know this as a fact? I have it on good authority. >I mean, rabbit is lovely[1], but I've never tasted cat... well, me neither, and I agree rabbit is lovely. I'm told cat tastes awful (back to the carnivores-tasting-horrible subthread of a few weeks back). This from a Vietnamese ex cow-orker who's eaten pretty much anything (when you're a boat-person, the family moggy fairly quickly morphs into "lunch") >[1] I have one in the freezer, ready to make into a nice stew. nice. -- d. |