Prev: Rossi uses a cane?
Next: Funny road signs
From: Iarnrod on 19 Jul 2010 22:37
On Jul 19, 7:47 am, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...(a)live.com> wrote:

> I don't agree with every point you've made either but at least you've
> tried to engage in discussion and offered positions.  

BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!! Hot KOOK ON KOOK action!!!

> I, too, have grave
> doubts to the veracity of the 9-11 commission report on issues quite
> different than yours.

Of course. All of you kooks who reject the proven truth have your own
mutually contradictory and physically impossible alternatives. It's
what makes kicking your asses so FUNNY!!

> Earlier, *before* the WTC impact there were events which required not
> just a suspension of credulity but the participation of so far unnamed
> people high up in our own government.  

Name one.

> The one issue no one has ever
> explained adequately:  it is impossible for a jet airliner to cruise for
> a half hour in the Washington-New York air corridor without being
> intercepted by fighter aircraft.

That is a flat-out lie. It is merely a statement by you with no
factual support whatsoever.

> Many years ago, in the 1960's in fact, Air Traffic Control (both tower
> and radar) were linked with NORAD for precisely this event.

No, they were not.

>  Notification
> is automatic and multiple air bases in, and around, that corridor have
> 24/7 fighter interceptors ready to launch.

That is of course a flat out lie. It wasn't automatic then and it
isn't even now. FAA had to make the call to NORAD. There was nothign
whatsoever automatic about it. You're lying again. Kurly Kook.

> That system failed.

That system did not exist.

> Despite regular tests, despite multiple redundancies, not a single
> interceptor was launched for almost 45 minutes.  That is an absolute
> impossibility without interference *within* the chain of command.

Complete lie.

> Not unlike the Reichstag Fire or Operation Northwoods.

Operation Northwoods is fiction. It never occurred, Kurly. Like your
9/11 "scenarios," do you "think" you can conjure real physical events
with just yoru imagination?
From: Henry on 20 Jul 2010 10:03
Ironhead grossed out readers with:

> BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!! Hot KOOK ON KOOK action!!!

Your bruised, bent, and now festering zucchini isn't a
kook, ironhead. And in spite of "companionship" it provides
you, it's not even human. If it was, it wouldn't get
anywhere near you. And of course, the action isn't hot.
The disturbing mental image alone is gross enough to gag
a maggot. <chuckle>



--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org


From: Curly Surmudgeon on 20 Jul 2010 10:53
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:03:58 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote:

> Ironhead grossed out readers with:
>
>> BWAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!! Hot KOOK ON KOOK action!!!
>
> Your bruised, bent, and now festering zucchini isn't a
> kook, ironhead. And in spite of "companionship" it provides you, it's
> not even human. If it was, it wouldn't get anywhere near you. And of
> course, the action isn't hot. The disturbing mental image alone is gross
> enough to gag a maggot. <chuckle>

I have another groupie-stalker?

Cool, the Bozo Bin has lots of room.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lest we forget: Scott McInnis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Rossi uses a cane?
Next: Funny road signs