Constructive criticism required
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: Cab on 12 Aug 2010 05:47 On 12 Aug, 11:28, darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Not sure if this should be OT or not, as it's vaguely on topic. > >http://www.lanoyeraierocamadour.com > > don't do the menu like that. Have an overall language selection (two > flags, d'uh) on the top right of the screen, and then a seperate menu > for each language sub-site. In the pipeline > I don't actually like javascript/DIV style menus any more generally > though - a bit 2003. Plus, you'd get a "fail" for accessibility. IANAE. I's still learning, see. Ta though. -- Cab
From: ogden on 12 Aug 2010 06:01 Champ wrote: > On 12 Aug 2010 08:29:22 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: > > >Plus, if you use "the plan is" you don't need "in the future".[1] :o) > > >[1] One of my current bugbears is people peppering their sentences with > >"going forward" - "Our plan going forward is...". Aaaaaarrrggghhh! > > Crikey, that sort of cod-management speak has been winding me up for > 10 years or more. People seem to think that dropping 'going forward' > into a sentence somehow adds some dynamism to their point. In almost > every circumstance you can omit the 'going forward' and retain the > same meaning. "Going forward, I'll get together with yourself offline", etc. Ugh. -- ogden | gsxr 1000 | ktm duke 2
From: Hasse K on 12 Aug 2010 06:09 Derek Turner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:14:25 +0200, Hasse K wrote: >> The pictures need to be more integrated in the pages. When >> describing a room I want to see a picture of it on that page. > > When sitting at home with a 2 meg broadband connection, I agree. > Spare a thought for those using dial-up in a hotel bedroom or a slow > EPRS-only phone signal while on the road. If you must incorporate > piccies make them clickable thumbnails. I might lose patience and > look elsewhere if large graphics were forced on me. That is a valid point. But when on dial-up I would disable the automatic showing of pictures in my browser. -- Hasse
From: Ace on 12 Aug 2010 06:22 On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:13:53 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: >On 12 Aug 2010 08:29:22 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: > >>Plus, if you use "the plan is" you don't need "in the future".[1] :o) > >>[1] One of my current bugbears is people peppering their sentences with >>"going forward" - "Our plan going forward is...". Aaaaaarrrggghhh! > >Crikey, that sort of cod-management speak has been winding me up for >10 years or more. People seem to think that dropping 'going forward' >into a sentence somehow adds some dynamism to their point. In almost >every circumstance you can omit the 'going forward' and retain the >same meaning. Is that a "to-be" scenario you're talking about. THat onbe winds me up just as much.
From: darsy on 12 Aug 2010 06:35
On Aug 12, 10:47 am, Cab <ros...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 Aug, 11:28, darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Not sure if this should be OT or not, as it's vaguely on topic. > > >http://www.lanoyeraierocamadour.com > > > don't do the menu like that. Have an overall language selection (two > > flags, d'uh) on the top right of the screen, and then a seperate menu > > for each language sub-site. > > In the pipeline > > > I don't actually like javascript/DIV style menus any more generally > > though - a bit 2003. Plus, you'd get a "fail" for accessibility. > > IANAE. I's still learning, see. Ta though. drop me an email if you want any specific advice / pointers to learning resources. -- d. |