Constructive criticism required
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: Cab on 12 Aug 2010 10:05 On Aug 12, 2:18 pm, Ofnuts <o.f.n.u....(a)la.poste.net> wrote: > Didn't look at the code, only the results: > > - a misleading coloring of the french/english pulldown in the menu makes > it hard to tell if you are in the right language. Fixed in the next edition. > - "location" in French means "rental" or "lease"... Use "situation" or > "localisation" instead (or the cutesy "Y aller", "Où sommes-nous?", > "Pour venir"... ) I can't believe I missed that. Ta. > - No "<title>" in the page, also mean it would appear in the bookmark > list of a user as the plain URL. This seems true of other pages as well > (always remember that <title> ends up as a URL description in bookmarks, > to it should be "absolute" ("La Noyeraie: rooms") and not "relative" > ("rooms"). Ta. > - The French part needs a good review, there is this strange entrance > flight of steps with a built-in kettle and coffee-machine... Contact me > offline if you/they want some help for this. > > - General looks are good, though a green or yellow tone would be more in > tune with the area IMHO. > > - Seems to require a quite wide display, not sure it would work well > accessed from an iPod I was thinking of a mobile version, but I need to get a round tuit. > - Come to think of it, Rocamadour being a well known pilgrimage, they > may want an Irish version :-) Spanish is in the pipeline, but I need to convince SWMBO to do it. :-) -- Cab
From: Cab on 12 Aug 2010 10:12 On Aug 12, 3:59 pm, Cab <ros...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Point of order. In French, it's "poney". It's late. I'm tired. LITSTPRU. Sorry TOG. -- Cab
From: darsy on 12 Aug 2010 11:06 On Aug 12, 1:00 pm, Ben <b...(a)bensalesDOTME.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:28:00 -0700 (PDT), darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Aug 12, 8:43 am, Cab <ros...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not sure if this should be OT or not, as it's vaguely on topic. > > >>http://www.lanoyeraierocamadour.com > > >don't do the menu like that. Have an overall language selection (two > >flags, d'uh) on the top right of the screen, and then a seperate menu > >for each language sub-site. > > >I don't actually like javascript/DIV style menus any more generally > >though - a bit 2003. Plus, you'd get a "fail" for accessibility. > > That's not true as of WCAG2. But, yeah, they're better as pure CSS. really? And how does someone navigate this site if Javascript is disabled, or unavailable (say a screen-reader)? -- d.
From: SIRPip on 12 Aug 2010 12:39 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:22:41 +0200, Ace <b.rogers(a)ifrance.com> wrote: > > Is that a "to-be" scenario you're talking about. THat onbe winds me > > up just as much. > > Christ. > > Fortunately, I've not heard that one before. "Onbe"? Everybody uses it now, dahling. -- SIRPip : B12
From: Ace on 12 Aug 2010 13:15
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:39:17 +0000 (UTC), "SIRPip" <gingerbloke(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Champ wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:22:41 +0200, Ace <b.rogers(a)ifrance.com> wrote: > >> > Is that a "to-be" scenario you're talking about. THat onbe winds me >> > up just as much. >> >> Christ. >> >> Fortunately, I've not heard that one before. > >"Onbe"? Everybody uses it now, dahling. TSITSTPRU. |