From: CT on
Pip Luscher wrote:

> I'd agree, all quite possible. Oh, and let us not forget that Church
> thing (I forget the proper name), where if it was once err, some sort
> of Church owned land, then the new landowner could find themselves
> quite legitimately being expected to pay tens of thousands towards the
> new Church roof. Or something like that; I forget the exact details. I
> think you can take out insurance against this sort of thing though.

Chancel Tax.

--
Chris
From: Pip Luscher on
On 7 Jun 2010 09:08:48 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote:

>Pip Luscher wrote:
>
>> I'd agree, all quite possible. Oh, and let us not forget that Church
>> thing (I forget the proper name), where if it was once err, some sort
>> of Church owned land, then the new landowner could find themselves
>> quite legitimately being expected to pay tens of thousands towards the
>> new Church roof. Or something like that; I forget the exact details. I
>> think you can take out insurance against this sort of thing though.
>
>Chancel Tax.

That's the medieval puppy.

--
-Pip