Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: P plate training ...not
Next: Australian Standard 1698
From: Nev.. on 17 Feb 2007 06:27 Moike wrote: >> It is Usenet. Who cares? > > The "it's only usenet" is is generally the last refuge of failed > bullshit artists. Funny, I thought it was accusations of "the Chewbacca defence". Nev.. '04 CBR1100XX
From: Dale Porter on 17 Feb 2007 07:17 "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote >>> An interesting point, you also need to consider laminar vs turbulent flow. >>> This IS important when considering "levels" of air. >>> >>> Hammo >>> >> >> In the words of Ms Hanson.... "Please explain". What is laminar? > > I looked at Wiki as it has become the "benchmark" > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminar_flow > > However it has no reference re: airflow. Laminar, smooth, turbulent rough. > > This was incredibly important, and has become a consideration of all > industrial/commercial drying, ovens etc that greater efficiency is achieved > with laminar flow. > > Ahh OK. Turbulent was self explanatory, but I had not come across the term "laminar" before. -- Dale Porter GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J
From: Dale Porter on 17 Feb 2007 07:19 "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message news:45d6e6cb$0$24704$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > Moike wrote: > >>> It is Usenet. Who cares? >> >> The "it's only usenet" is is generally the last refuge of failed bullshit artists. > > Funny, I thought it was accusations of "the Chewbacca defence". > > OK....I've been resisting, but I have to ask..... "Chewbacca defence"? -- Dale Porter GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J
From: Hammo on 17 Feb 2007 07:48 On 17/2/07 11:17 PM, in article er6rot$10tm$1(a)otis.netspace.net.au, "Dale Porter" <daleaporter(a)gmail.com> wrote: > "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote >>>> An interesting point, you also need to consider laminar vs turbulent flow. >>>> This IS important when considering "levels" of air. >>>> >>>> Hammo >>>> >>> >>> In the words of Ms Hanson.... "Please explain". What is laminar? >> >> I looked at Wiki as it has become the "benchmark" >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminar_flow >> >> However it has no reference re: airflow. Laminar, smooth, turbulent rough. >> >> This was incredibly important, and has become a consideration of all >> industrial/commercial drying, ovens etc that greater efficiency is achieved >> with laminar flow. >> >> > > Ahh OK. Turbulent was self explanatory, but I had not come across the term > "laminar" before. Really? I don't know how else to describe it. It has greater applicability with fluids (often in pipes), though, with cars and motorcycles I thought it had become a "staple" point of discussion re: horsepower increases whether it be inlet or exhaust, wrt flow to and from. This is a good "quick visual". http://www.aviation-history.com/theory/lam-flow.htm Hammo
From: Smee R11S on 17 Feb 2007 09:18
Dale Porter wrote: > "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message news:45d6e6cb$0$24704$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >> Moike wrote: >> >>>> It is Usenet. Who cares? >>> The "it's only usenet" is is generally the last refuge of failed bullshit artists. >> Funny, I thought it was accusations of "the Chewbacca defence". >> >> > > OK....I've been resisting, but I have to ask..... "Chewbacca defence"? > Southpark episode. It's how OJ simpson got off apparently. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH5EblIjkrk |