Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: P plate training ...not
Next: Australian Standard 1698
From: Dale Porter on 15 Feb 2007 06:34 "Goaty" <John.Lamp(a)gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >> >> >> Eh? Flotation is based on temperature? > > No, density ... thus proving you'd sink! :) > > Nicely played Sir! -- Dale Porter GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J
From: Knobdoodle on 15 Feb 2007 06:50 "Goaty" <John.Lamp(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:12t8fmkah4bc2bb(a)corp.supernews.com... > Yeebok wrote: >> Iain Chalmers wrote: >> >>> In article <AHUAh.1426$4c6.428(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au>, >>> "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "Peter Cremasco" <FirstName.LastName(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message >>>> news:jk38t29gcr43dcheiaq60ver5gb1ad73am(a)4ax.com... >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:18:38 GMT, "Knobdoodle" >>>>> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It also expands when cooled below zero! >>>>>> [cue Twilight-Zone music] >>>>> >>>>> Below 4 degrees C, I think. >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> You're right; but I think it's negative 4. >>> >>> >>> Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >>> >>> big >>> >> Not because it's lighter or less dense ? >> >> Cool ! > > Yes, precisely that! 4C is when water is at maximum density, hence it > expands when below or above 4C. Does that make it any more clear for you? > So if the drink was 12 degrees and the ice was -4 it wouldn't float? -- Clem
From: Knobdoodle on 15 Feb 2007 07:01 "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message news:C1FA8B72.26F2C%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... > > > > On 15/2/07 11:08 AM, in article slrnet793n.3l6.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org, > "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote: > >> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah; that's what I said. >>> >>> ...and I agree with what you said. >> >> So you're saying he must be wrong because he agrees with you, then? >> > No, he was correct. > So why did you post; I'd already covered it hadn't I? Do you just Hammo-obfuscate automatically? -- Clem
From: Hammo on 15 Feb 2007 07:19 On 15/2/07 11:01 PM, in article jYXAh.1500$4c6.180(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message > news:C1FA8B72.26F2C%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... >> >> >> >> On 15/2/07 11:08 AM, in article slrnet793n.3l6.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org, >> "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote: >> >>> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>>> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah; that's what I said. >>>> >>>> ...and I agree with what you said. >>> >>> So you're saying he must be wrong because he agrees with you, then? >>> >> No, he was correct. >> > So why did you post; I'd already covered it hadn't I? > Do you just Hammo-obfuscate automatically? How can it be obfuscating if it describes what is happening? Sorry if it confused you. Hammo
From: Knobdoodle on 15 Feb 2007 07:28
"Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message news:C1FA9AEB.26FD6%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... > > > > On 15/2/07 11:01 PM, in article > jYXAh.1500$4c6.180(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" > <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message >> news:C1FA8B72.26F2C%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... >>> >>> >>> >>> On 15/2/07 11:08 AM, in article slrnet793n.3l6.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org, >>> "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>>>> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah; that's what I said. >>>>> >>>>> ...and I agree with what you said. >>>> >>>> So you're saying he must be wrong because he agrees with you, then? >>>> >>> No, he was correct. >>> >> So why did you post; I'd already covered it hadn't I? >> Do you just Hammo-obfuscate automatically? > > How can it be obfuscating if it describes what is happening? Sorry if it > confused you. > Well that seemed to be the intention but no; it didn't confuse me (hence the "that's what I said"). Why else would you describe what had already been described? -- Clem |