Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: P plate training ...not
Next: Australian Standard 1698
From: Hammo on 15 Feb 2007 07:37 On 15/2/07 11:28 PM, in article MlYAh.1506$4c6.31(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message > news:C1FA9AEB.26FD6%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... >> >> >> >> On 15/2/07 11:01 PM, in article >> jYXAh.1500$4c6.180(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" >> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message >>> news:C1FA8B72.26F2C%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 15/2/07 11:08 AM, in article slrnet793n.3l6.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org, >>>> "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>>>>> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah; that's what I said. >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and I agree with what you said. >>>>> >>>>> So you're saying he must be wrong because he agrees with you, then? >>>>> >>>> No, he was correct. >>>> >>> So why did you post; I'd already covered it hadn't I? >>> Do you just Hammo-obfuscate automatically? >> >> How can it be obfuscating if it describes what is happening? Sorry if it >> confused you. >> > Well that seemed to be the intention but no; it didn't confuse me (hence the > "that's what I said"). > Why else would you describe what had already been described? I followed up the wrong post would be the most logical explanation. Hammo
From: Yeebok on 15 Feb 2007 07:38 Knobdoodle wrote: >>>> >>>> Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >>>> >>> Not because it's lighter or less dense ? >>> >>> Cool ! >> Yes, precisely that! 4C is when water is at maximum density, hence it >> expands when below or above 4C. Does that make it any more clear for you? >> > So if the drink was 12 degrees and the ice was -4 it wouldn't float? Oh .. it was just you said "Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats". I thought it was less dense and you agreed with me. Now I am confused 'coz the plus 4 seems to have no relevance to the ice's ability to float, and instead it's based on the density of the liquid it's in .. Either I'm missing you not missing how stupid I'm being or I'm stupider than I think I am. @Goat: I reckon the ice'd float 'til it melted. From there it'd be fairly hard to tell and since the original question refers to ice and it'd be water so therefore irrelevant anyway. Eww pedant germs ! Geddemoffme!
From: Yeebok on 15 Feb 2007 07:40 Goaty wrote: > Hammo wrote: >>> Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >> >> >> Eh? Flotation is based on temperature? > > No, density ... thus proving you'd sink! :) > > Cheers > Goaty Err no .. pretty sure you missed what we were getting at .. a sentence being a single self contained statement.. More pedant germs..
From: Knobdoodle on 15 Feb 2007 07:46 "Yeebok" <yeebok(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:45d45456$1(a)news.comindico.com.au... > Knobdoodle wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >>>>> >>>> Not because it's lighter or less dense ? >>>> >>>> Cool ! >>> Yes, precisely that! 4C is when water is at maximum density, hence it >>> expands when below or above 4C. Does that make it any more clear for >>> you? >>> >> So if the drink was 12 degrees and the ice was -4 it wouldn't float? > > Oh .. it was just you said "Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats". I thought > it was less dense and you agreed with me. Now I am confused 'coz the plus > 4 seems to have no relevance to the ice's ability to float, and instead > it's based on the density of the liquid it's in .. > > Either I'm missing you not missing how stupid I'm being or I'm stupider > than I think I am. > > @Goat: > I reckon the ice'd float 'til it melted. From there it'd be fairly hard to > tell and since the original question refers to ice and it'd be water so > therefore irrelevant anyway. > Or c) it wasn't me who said "Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats". -- Clem
From: Knobdoodle on 15 Feb 2007 07:48
"Yeebok" <yeebok(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:45d454b4$1(a)news.comindico.com.au... > Goaty wrote: >> Hammo wrote: >>>> Nope, plus 4, thats why ice floats... >>> >>> >>> Eh? Flotation is based on temperature? >> >> No, density ... thus proving you'd sink! :) >> >> Cheers >> Goaty > Err no .. pretty sure you missed what we were getting at .. a sentence > being a single self contained statement.. > And you're missing a damn good insult when you've seen one! -- Clem (Thus proving that you'd sink too!) |