From: Ace on 9 Nov 2009 03:46
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:40:06 +0000, Pip Luscher
>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:04:49 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The
>Older Gentleman) wrote:
>>eBay item 180427003212
Nice. But why? I mean, I did this to mine back in 1980, but only
because the forks were bent beyond repair in a smash and I managed to
swap the nice alloy 21" front wheel for an entire Kwak front end for
no extra dosh (of which I had none). It was already a great bike on
the road, so I reckone the only advantage to this would be the wider
availability of tyres in the new size, as I don't suppose 21" road
tyres are that easy to come by.
>With my recent hard-won experience of ebay listings:
> "...The bike is valued at �10-12000..." - valued by whom? Or did he
>mean "�10 - �12000"?
Heh. But yes, one of those unreal "values".