From: scrape on
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:31:58 -0500, "KW"
<keith_warrennospam(a)windstream.net> wrote:

>Touch�

Not required. I knew you'd get it.
From: WoodsChick on
On Nov 1, 7:58 pm, scrape <scrapeNOTHA...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:54:57 -0800 (PST), WoodsChick
>
>
>
>
>
> <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 1, 5:42 am, scrape <scrapeNOTHA...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT), WoodsChick
>
> >> <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> >> >Yep, I knew exactly what Jeff meant. He made it clear by saying how
> >> >legal does it have to be "to be a dualsport there." I was responding
> >> >to Scrape saying it was a fantasy of his to ride there on a KTM 640
> >> >Adventure <G>
>
> >> >And yes, Scrape, I do believe you'd be up for some sort of award
> >> >should you decide on this route!
>
> >> The 640 is starting to look like the bike that's going to occupy
> >> my fantasy for the time being.
>
> >Are you stuck on the Adventure or have you considered an LC4 640e?
> >Eric's been loving his 640e. Super versatile, go-anywhere bike, more
> >versatile than the Adv in my opinion, especially if you're a true off-
> >road rider. He's ridden it on single track lots of times, ridden it in
> >Baja at +100mph, done 200-mile days off-road with a full load of
> >camping gear, and it is the perfect urban assault vehicle for the
> >hellish commutes here in the Bay Area. If you're looking for more
> >highway riding, though (thus less "Adventure" <G>) then the Adv might
> >be for you. Tell me your thoughts!
>
> >Eric's first LC4 640e in Nevada...
> >http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb35/WoodsChick/Nevada%20May%2008/...
>
> >And his 2nd one in Baja...
> >http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb35/WoodsChick/Baja%20Feb%2009/Ba...
>
> No, I'm not stuck on anything at all.  In fact, as of today, I'm
> leaning towards a DR650.

Crappy rear tire selection. If you go with a DR650, lace your rear hub
to an 18" rim.

>
> And I guess I always preferred the Enduro to the Adventure.  And
> by always, I mean for the last 48 hours.- Hide quoted text -

Hey, 48 hours can be a really long time.
The enduro models are a lot cheaper than the Adv model, even though
they're harder to find. Same motor on the Enduro model, but with less
weight and better suspension.

Tami-
From: PrairieRider on
On Oct 31, 11:37 am, WoodsChick <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 12:43 am, PrairieRider <psbeck...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 30, 9:26 pm, WoodsChick <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 30, 7:54 pm, scrape <scrapeNOTHA...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:03:23 -0700 (PDT), sturd
>
> > > > <mikesturdevant...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >HellSickle cogitates:
>
> > > > >> Hmmmmmm......
>
> > > > >> An entire week....   I need to get another bike mount put on the
> > > > >> trailer, so we can bring both trail & dual sport bikes.
>
> > > > >How legal does a bike have to be to be a dual sport there?
> > > > >Just theoretically.
>
> > > > Current fantasy is a 640 Adventure from here to there and back,
> > > > but that's ~4800 miles...
>
> > > So it's 4800 miles...what's your point?
>
> > > We don't care *how* you get there, just save yourself for some riding
> > > once you do get there.
>
> > > Tami-
>
> > Uh...I think Hell was wondering what constitutes a legal dual sport
> > bike in Eeee-da-how, not what's a legal route to get to this event.
> > Now way we're gonna tow trail bikes behind the dual sports anyway :-D-
>
> Yep, I knew exactly what Jeff meant. He made it clear by saying how
> legal does it have to be "to be a dualsport there." I was responding
> to Scrape saying it was a fantasy of his to ride there on a KTM 640
> Adventure <G>
>
> And yes, Scrape, I do believe you'd be up for some sort of award
> should you decide on this route!
>
> Tami-

I'm an idjit. <blush> I realized my mistake later and meant to say
something about needing lessons on how to read text based forum
posts. I'll go crawl back out to the garage now...need to swap out
front tube.
From: WoodsChick on
On Nov 2, 5:08 pm, PrairieRider <psbeck...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 11:37 am, WoodsChick <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 31, 12:43 am, PrairieRider <psbeck...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 30, 9:26 pm, WoodsChick <TamiRow...(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 30, 7:54 pm, scrape <scrapeNOTHA...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:03:23 -0700 (PDT), sturd
>
> > > > > <mikesturdevant...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >HellSickle cogitates:
>
> > > > > >> Hmmmmmm......
>
> > > > > >> An entire week....   I need to get another bike mount put on the
> > > > > >> trailer, so we can bring both trail & dual sport bikes.
>
> > > > > >How legal does a bike have to be to be a dual sport there?
> > > > > >Just theoretically.
>
> > > > > Current fantasy is a 640 Adventure from here to there and back,
> > > > > but that's ~4800 miles...
>
> > > > So it's 4800 miles...what's your point?
>
> > > > We don't care *how* you get there, just save yourself for some riding
> > > > once you do get there.
>
> > > > Tami-
>
> > > Uh...I think Hell was wondering what constitutes a legal dual sport
> > > bike in Eeee-da-how, not what's a legal route to get to this event.
> > > Now way we're gonna tow trail bikes behind the dual sports anyway :-D-
>
> > Yep, I knew exactly what Jeff meant. He made it clear by saying how
> > legal does it have to be "to be a dualsport there." I was responding
> > to Scrape saying it was a fantasy of his to ride there on a KTM 640
> > Adventure <G>
>
> > And yes, Scrape, I do believe you'd be up for some sort of award
> > should you decide on this route!
>
> > Tami-
>
> I'm an idjit. <blush>

LOL! No you aren't! Although, you *are* dating Jeff...hmm...


> I realized my mistake later and meant to say
> something about needing lessons on how to read text based forum
> posts.  

Hey, don't feel bad; turns out we *both* got it wrong<G> I didn't even
know who the hell I was quoting!
I found RMD before almost anything else on the internets (I was a late
bloomer) so it just seems normal to me, but I would imagine it would
look kinda weird and not be too user friendly if someone were used to
all that techno-slickery of ADV and such.

> I'll go crawl back out to the garage now...need to swap out
> front tube.

Hey, while you're at it I need a new front tire on my KTM, `kay?
<snicker!>


Tami-

From: scrape on
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 04:10:16 -0800 (PST), WoodsChick
<TamiRowell(a)msn.com> wrote:

>> No, I'm not stuck on anything at all. �In fact, as of today, I'm
>> leaning towards a DR650.
>
>Crappy rear tire selection. If you go with a DR650, lace your rear hub
>to an 18" rim.

Still stuck on the DR as of today - it's cheap, what the hell... -
but total cost is going to be a consideration. New ones are under
$6K. Two year old ones are advertised in the $3500 range.

>> And I guess I always preferred the Enduro to the Adventure. �And
>> by always, I mean for the last 48 hours.- Hide quoted text -
>
>Hey, 48 hours can be a really long time.
>The enduro models are a lot cheaper than the Adv model, even though
>they're harder to find. Same motor on the Enduro model, but with less
>weight and better suspension.

BUT - what do you get on the ADV? More oil capacity for longer
range between changes, etc. Seems like the book is out on some of
the models, but others are well regarded.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: RMD User Map
Next: CRF 450 transmission drain plug