Is Puerto Rico onto something here?
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: The Usual Mexican Fifth Column Traitors seek to thwart Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law (before it is signed into law).
Next: Remember when folks around here liked tractors?
From: Bob Myers on 23 Apr 2010 12:30 On 4/22/2010 4:46 PM, ? wrote: > On Apr 22, 3:31 pm, "Mr.Sandman"<somewh...(a)overtherainbow.com> wrote: > > >> According to Jefferson, all men were born free and if they were born >> free then they are equal. No one is born a slave. If no one is born a >> slave, then they are all born free. >> > You're that obnoxious Jewish boy that lives in his mother's basement > near Ft. Worth, right? > Ah, the expected Krusty response - when you can't argue the facts, fall back on the ol' tried-and-true attempted ad-hominem attack. Have you EVER considered growing up and becoming a functioning adult human being? Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 23 Apr 2010 12:33 On 4/22/2010 7:32 PM, Twibil wrote: > On Apr 22, 1:55 pm, Bob Myers<nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote: > >> >> Maybe you should have to prove your value as a citizen through, say, oh, >> I don't know - getting a decent score on a simple civics test, maybe? >> > Ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh! > > You're a *MEAN* one, Mister Grinch! (:-O > > Who, ME? Never! Actually, I seem to recall that we require exactly that sort of test for those wishing to become citizens - and since His Krustiness was bringing up his tired old "who should be a citizen" nonsense, the "what's good for the goose" line of though naturally presented itself. I note that he still hasn't identified anything especially bad about the idea, beyond the obvious fact that he himself could not pass any such test. Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 23 Apr 2010 12:34 On 4/22/2010 8:36 PM, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote: > My recollection is that all the questions, including > the one which I missed, required nothing more than > careful reading, a little bit of logical thought and some > knowledge of history. > > Perhaps you're saying that the language was confusing ? > You seem to be making the assumption that Krusty's native language is American English. On what evidence are you basing that? Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on 23 Apr 2010 12:38 On 4/22/2010 11:16 PM, CS wrote: > > I disagree. If he's a private citizen and a respondant in civil or > criminal court, then yes, he has no obligation to show such proof, > however, he is a public servant, and so it is entirely his obligation > to show whatever proof is required of him that he is, in fact, > qualified for this position. But only if there is reasonable evidence to the contrary, that outweighs such supporting evidence as has already been presented. To date, no such contradictory evidence has been brought into the discussion, and Obama already presented sufficient evidence such that the vast majority of reasonable participants in the discussion have considered the matter settled. Why should he spend time and effort to do more, until and unless the current status quo is seriously challenged? I wouldn't, you wouldn't, and it is unreasonable to expect that he or his staff would. Bob M.
From: Twibil on 23 Apr 2010 14:33
On Apr 22, 10:16 pm, "CS" <donts...(a)sears.com> wrote: > Sure, some folks simply will not believe any proof supplied to > them, but when don't-much-care guys like me have doubts, > there's a problem. Oh, sorry, we failed to realise that this was all about *you*; I.E. "if guys like me have doubts, then there's problem". In reality, if guys like you have doubts then it means you either (A) haven't bothered looking at the facts, (B) don't *want* to look at the facts, (C) aren't really a "don't-much-care guy" at all, or, (D) lack the capacity to understand that everybody except fruitcakes accepts the fact that Obama was born in Hawaii. Time to move on towards things that have at least a soupcon of reality and a dash of relevance somewhere in their recipes. |