From: ? on
This could be a way to get control of all the anchor babies in the
USA!

Invalidate their birth certificates and ake them prove that all their
great great grandparents were America citizens (like mine were).

Puerto Rico to Invalidate Every Birth Certificate

Born before July 1, 2010? You'll have to reapply

Newser) – Talk about an extreme way to tackle identify theft: This
July Puerto Rico will invalidate every birth certificate it has handed
out.

Its 4 million residents, and the 1.2 million Puerto Ricans living in
the US, will then have to reapply for the document.

The government hopes the radical decision will cut down on fraud,
which is so rampant that an estimated 40% of US passport fraud cases
center around Puerto Rican birth certificates, many of which are sold
on the black market for thousands, reports ABC News.

To wit: Though about 45,000 children were born in there in 2008, the
country's vital statistics office issued some 860,000 certified
copies.

Part of the problem may also stem from the fact that Puerto Ricans
hand out such copies like one would a resume or business card, making
them easy to get a hold of.

"I don't know why we do it," said a government director. But "anybody
who grew up in Puerto Rico saw it happen."

http://www.newser.com/story/86605/puerto-rico-to-invalidate-every-birth-certificate.html
From: Datesfat Chicks on
"?" <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:91e67e77-d0f2-4379-b6a3-f7a8cab338f4(a)h31g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>This could be a way to get control of all the children of illegal
>immigrants in the
>USA!
>
>Invalidate their birth certificates and ake them prove that all their
>great great grandparents were America citizens (like mine were).

I think ultimately that the only way to tackle the problem is to associate
the birth certificate with some quality of the individual that can't be
modified, such as DNA or an implanted chip. DNA, naturally, is more
difficult to modify or replace than an implanted chip.

In other words, the strategy towards identity theft prevention has to be
stronger and start at birth.

Want a driver's license? Submit a form, a copy of your birth certificate,
and a swab of the inside of your mouth.

Datesfat

From: ? on
On Apr 22, 8:20 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think ultimately that the only way to tackle the problem is to associate
> the birth certificate with some quality of the individual that can't be
> modified, such as DNA or an implanted chip.  DNA, naturally, is more
> difficult to modify or replace than an implanted chip.

Welcome to your "Brave New World" or to "Gattaca." The Jewish
propagandists won't like your idea, but they sure liked the *money*
they made from the movies...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gattaca

Before anything like this can happen though, the American public needs
to be re-educated as to what Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration
Committee actually *meant* by the phrases "we hold these truths to be
self evident," and "all men are created equal."

In the first phrase, TJ and the Commitee stated that they weren't
going to debate on what "truth" was, they were simply saying that what
*followed* was their position and they weren't going to debate that
position.

The second phrase was intended to address their desire for the
*political equality* as regarded the lack of representation of White
English *men* back home in English parliament.

The French revolutionaries were inspired by the success of the
American Revolution and they didn't have a *race problem* or slavery
to deal with in France.

The French Revolution was purely a *class* struggle and their
Declaration of the Rights of Man had nothing to do with race.

Centuries later, the UN Declaration of Human Rights has supported the
"right" of refugees to migrate to other countries against the will of
the inhabitants thereof, so many Third Worlders want to come and live
in more developed countries instead of remaining in their own country
and solving their own problems through struggle, just as Real
Americans struggled to make a decent place out of the wilderness of
North America.

So what has to happen for Americans to enjoy a country populated by
people of their own ethnicity is to utterly root out and destroy the
propaganda that claims that all men are created racially equal and
admit that the USA was founded by free WHITE men of good character who
intended to leave the county they had established to their own free
WHITE children of good character.
From: Datesfat Chicks on
"?" <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eaca7dd7-f3d3-4ac3-ba93-09e88e51e80f(a)y3g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>On Apr 22, 8:20 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>So what has to happen for Americans to enjoy a country populated by
>people of their own ethnicity is to utterly root out and destroy the
>propaganda that claims that all men are created racially equal and
>admit that the USA was founded by free WHITE men of good character who
>intended to leave the county they had established to their own free
>WHITE children of good character.

Non sequitur, dude.

My response was only geared towards identity theft prevention. I wasn't at
all indicating that I agree with your views on racial matters.

Frankly, I suggest you write to Mr. Obama about your views. Be sure to let
him know that, as a black man, you don't think he should have been elected
president. Also be sure to let him know that, as a black man, he isn't
equal to you.

Frankly, I'd pay to be reading your letter back to you while the Secret
Service is tasering you repeatedly.

I'd pay even more to do the tasering while the Secret Service reads the
letter to you.

Datesfat

From: ? on
On Apr 22, 9:08 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message

> >So what has to happen for Americans to enjoy a country populated by
> >people of their own ethnicity is to utterly root out and destroy the
> >propaganda that claims that all men are created racially equal and
> >admit that the USA was founded by free WHITE men of good character who
> >intended to leave the county they had established to their own free
> >WHITE children of good character.
>
> Non sequitur, dude.
>
> My response was only geared towards identity theft prevention.  I wasn't at
> all indicating that I agree with your views on racial matters.

Sometimes you can tell that a suspicious person is likely to be a
criminal *just by looking at him/her*. Said person might have a degree
from Harvard Law School
in their back pocket, but it wouldn't be wise to open your door and
let him/her into your home.

http://www.bakersfield.com/news/local/x735122986/Children-are-suspects-in-grandmothers-killing?utm_source=widget_16&utm_medium=popular_entries_widget&utm_campaign=synapse

http://www.bakersfield.com/news/local/x735123293/Reports-Teen-murder-suspects-admit-going-into-womans-home-to-steal
>
> Frankly, I suggest you write to Mr. Obama about your views.  Be sure to let
> him know that, as a black man, you don't think he should have been elected
> president.

The reason that Obama shouldn't have been elected is that he's not
constitionally qualified to serve as POTUS, not being a US citizen.

> Also be sure to let him know that, as a black man, he isn't
> equal to you.

You just can't get it through your head that the US of A wasn't
founded on the principle of racial equality, can you?
>
> Frankly, I'd pay to be reading your letter back to you while the Secret
> Service is tasering you repeatedly.

Now you're getting deep into your fantasy.
>
> I'd pay even more to do the tasering while the Secret Service reads the
> letter to you.

Aren't childish fantasies fun? Now you're down to the level of the
Unibabbler (S'mee).
>
> Datesfat