Prev: Aldi special this week
Next: Demons
From: Zebee Johnstone on 25 Mar 2010 21:12 In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:49 -0700 (PDT) bikerbetty <bikerbetty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 26, 7:15?am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote: >> bikerbetty wrote: >> >> > betty, not too sure how I feel about all this, >> > but extremely gratified - totally blown away, in fact - >> > by the support of the Betty Faction on the panel. >> >> I'm sort of thinking "Yes Minister" the more I hear about this school :) >> >> G-S > > > Omigod! You're right! If I get the job I don't think I'll ever be able > to look the Head in the eye without thinking of Jim Hacker and > giggling. > > betty, also starting to see the similarities > between Bernard/Sir Humphrey and the > members of the Betty Faction. Wotta hoot! Start thinking up your irregular grammar examples now. "I'm a creative teacher, you are an eccentric member of staff, and he is a raving loony" Zebee
From: JL on 26 Mar 2010 00:37 On Mar 25, 11:05 pm, atec 77 <"atec 77 "@hotmail.com> wrote: > JL wrote: > > On Mar 25, 9:19 pm, atec 77 <"atec 77 "@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> You didn't even get near the Jacobite influences or even the Scott spill > >> over > > > Who are you and what have you done with Atec ? > > > JL > > If you ever chat directly with me over cuppa Fairly unlikely JL
From: bikerbetty on 26 Mar 2010 00:41 "Zebee Johnstone" <zebeej(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:slrnhqo2d6.1p55.zebeej(a)gmail.com... > In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:49 -0700 (PDT) > bikerbetty <bikerbetty(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 26, 7:15?am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote: >>> bikerbetty wrote: >>> >>> > betty, not too sure how I feel about all this, >>> > but extremely gratified - totally blown away, in fact - >>> > by the support of the Betty Faction on the panel. >>> >>> I'm sort of thinking "Yes Minister" the more I hear about this school :) >>> >>> G-S >> >> >> Omigod! You're right! If I get the job I don't think I'll ever be able >> to look the Head in the eye without thinking of Jim Hacker and >> giggling. >> >> betty, also starting to see the similarities >> between Bernard/Sir Humphrey and the >> members of the Betty Faction. Wotta hoot! > > Start thinking up your irregular grammar examples now. > > "I'm a creative teacher, you are an eccentric member of staff, and he > is a raving loony" > > Zebee [applause] betty
From: JL on 26 Mar 2010 00:55 On Mar 26, 12:19 am, Lars Chance <lars.cha...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > JL wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2:05 pm, Zebee Johnstone <zeb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:19:24 -0700 (PDT) > >> JL <jlitt...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > >>> Y'know it's interesting but I can't find on google groups the post > >>> where Zebee said that... > >> Message-ID: <slrnhqhbuu.1n1c.zeb...(a)gmail.com> > > > You post that like it's helpful to finding it on googlegroups - you're > > such a bloody sysadmin sometimes !! > > > G-G message ID number would be more helpful (1) > > (1) Which of course is the fatal logic flaw - assuming that was an > > attempt to be helpful > > Isn't the fact that the *author* of the queried post replied with a > reference (however unfathomable) sufficient to verify authenticity? It would be if authenticity was the issue at hand. However it wasn't. Content of the message was the issue - I was curious to read what she had written as the reply had quite rightly snipped much of the message away JL
From: VTR250 on 26 Mar 2010 00:58
On Mar 26, 7:23 am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote: > Iain Chalmers wrote: > > In article <slrnhqll4d.1p55.zeb...(a)gmail.com>, > > Zebee Johnstone <zeb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On the other hand, my SCA experience is that if you give the male of > >> the species a chance to dress brightly and show off magnificent > >> clothes most of them will. > > > Objection! "The male of the species", and "the subset of males of the > > species who show up to SCA events" are _not_ identical sets. > > > big > > That may be technically accurate, but there are other sub groups which > exhibit similar behaviour. > > In recent years various SF gatherings have been increasingly subject to > the trend called 'cosplay' which is in effect 'showing off in > magnificent clothes'. > > To the point where it's taken on it's own life separate and distinct > from the conventions. > > I don't think that just because Zebees example is a subgroup that you > can assume the tendency isn't widespread, or else why do similar effects > occur amongst unrelated groups? > > G-S I wouldn't go to a job interview dressed as a Betazoan in Starfleet uniform. ....unless I was doing an audition for the show. Then I would! |