From: Zebee Johnstone on
In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
bikerbetty <bikerbetty(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 7:15?am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote:
>> bikerbetty wrote:
>>
>> > betty, not too sure how I feel about all this,
>> > but extremely gratified - totally blown away, in fact -
>> > by the support of the Betty Faction on the panel.
>>
>> I'm sort of thinking "Yes Minister" the more I hear about this school :)
>>
>> G-S
>
>
> Omigod! You're right! If I get the job I don't think I'll ever be able
> to look the Head in the eye without thinking of Jim Hacker and
> giggling.
>
> betty, also starting to see the similarities
> between Bernard/Sir Humphrey and the
> members of the Betty Faction. Wotta hoot!

Start thinking up your irregular grammar examples now.

"I'm a creative teacher, you are an eccentric member of staff, and he
is a raving loony"

Zebee
From: JL on
On Mar 25, 11:05 pm, atec 77 <"atec 77 "@hotmail.com> wrote:
> JL wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 9:19 pm, atec 77 <"atec 77 "@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> You didn't even get near the Jacobite influences or even the Scott spill
> >> over
>
> > Who are you and what have you done with Atec ?
>
> > JL
>
> If you ever chat directly with me over  cuppa

Fairly unlikely

JL
From: bikerbetty on

"Zebee Johnstone" <zebeej(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhqo2d6.1p55.zebeej(a)gmail.com...
> In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
> bikerbetty <bikerbetty(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 26, 7:15?am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote:
>>> bikerbetty wrote:
>>>
>>> > betty, not too sure how I feel about all this,
>>> > but extremely gratified - totally blown away, in fact -
>>> > by the support of the Betty Faction on the panel.
>>>
>>> I'm sort of thinking "Yes Minister" the more I hear about this school :)
>>>
>>> G-S
>>
>>
>> Omigod! You're right! If I get the job I don't think I'll ever be able
>> to look the Head in the eye without thinking of Jim Hacker and
>> giggling.
>>
>> betty, also starting to see the similarities
>> between Bernard/Sir Humphrey and the
>> members of the Betty Faction. Wotta hoot!
>
> Start thinking up your irregular grammar examples now.
>
> "I'm a creative teacher, you are an eccentric member of staff, and he
> is a raving loony"
>
> Zebee

[applause]
betty


From: JL on
On Mar 26, 12:19 am, Lars Chance <lars.cha...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> JL wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2:05 pm, Zebee Johnstone <zeb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
> >> JL <jlitt...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> >>> Y'know it's interesting but I can't find on google groups the post
> >>> where Zebee said that...
> >> Message-ID: <slrnhqhbuu.1n1c.zeb...(a)gmail.com>  
>
> > You post that like it's helpful to finding it on googlegroups - you're
> > such a bloody sysadmin sometimes !!
>
> > G-G message ID number would be more helpful (1)
> > (1) Which of course is the fatal logic flaw - assuming that was an
> > attempt to be helpful
>
> Isn't the fact that the *author* of the queried post replied with a
> reference (however unfathomable) sufficient to verify authenticity?

It would be if authenticity was the issue at hand.

However it wasn't.

Content of the message was the issue - I was curious to read what she
had written as the reply had quite rightly snipped much of the message
away

JL
From: VTR250 on
On Mar 26, 7:23 am, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote:
> Iain Chalmers wrote:
> > In article <slrnhqll4d.1p55.zeb...(a)gmail.com>,
> >  Zebee Johnstone <zeb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On the other hand, my SCA experience is that if you give the male of
> >> the species a chance to dress brightly and show off magnificent
> >> clothes most of them will.
>
> > Objection! "The male of the species", and "the subset of males of the
> > species who show up to SCA events" are _not_ identical sets.
>
> > big
>
> That may be technically accurate, but there are other sub groups which
> exhibit similar behaviour.
>
> In recent years various SF gatherings have been increasingly subject to
> the trend called 'cosplay' which is in effect 'showing off in
> magnificent clothes'.
>
> To the point where it's taken on it's own life separate and distinct
> from the conventions.
>
> I don't think that just because Zebees example is a subgroup that you
> can assume the tendency isn't widespread, or else why do similar effects
> occur amongst unrelated groups?
>
> G-S

I wouldn't go to a job interview dressed as a Betazoan in Starfleet
uniform.

....unless I was doing an audition for the show. Then I would!
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Prev: Aldi special this week
Next: Demons