From: Steve H on
Steve <steveloukes(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 July, 16:30, Steve H <italian...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I discounted the K11 originally as they're too big and heavy for my
>> liking, which is also why I didn't got for a Pan.
>
> Blimey - unless you're a weakling midget a Pan is pretty easy
> to ride. I'm 5'7" and 12 stone and managed 14k miles on one.
> Steve

The riding us the easy bit.

The hard bit is threading it between cars on adjoining driveways to get
it into the garage.

Dropped my old VFR a couple of times doing that.
--
Steve H
From: crn on
Steve <steveloukes(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 July, 16:30, Steve H <italian...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I discounted the K11 originally as they're too big and heavy for my
> > liking, which is also why I didn't got for a Pan.
>
> Blimey - unless you're a weakling midget a Pan is pretty easy
> to ride. I'm 5'7" and 12 stone and managed 14k miles on one.
> Steve

Try pushing the damn thing backwards uphill into the garage then
wriggling it around the rest of the SOBs and junque[1] to its space.

[1] Stuff that will come in handy even if I never use it.

--
03 GS500K2
76 Honda 400/4 project
78 Honda 400/4 in black
06 Sukida SK50QT (Slanty eyed shopping trolley)
From: Ace on
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:15:47 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote:

>On 14 Jul 2010 16:11:47 GMT, Steve H <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> Tell me, does your use of geeky terms like E36 make you feel
>>> > > superior,
>>>>> or is it really totally unconscious? I do feel that it might have
>>> > > been
>>>>> more understood if you'd just said 3-series, or whatever it actually
>>>>> referred to.
>>>>
>>>> It signifies which era of 3 series it was. Just like saying 'mark 3
>>>> Escort' or similar.
>>>
>>> Yes, I know that's the general meaning, but why do you insist on using
>>> it, instead of the more normal terms that everyone would understand?
>>> It's not as if it makes any difference to your point.
>>
>>Erm, because BMWs aren't generally referred to as a mark 1, mark 2 etc.
>>
>>I don't see the problem, and given that you've never pulled anyone for
>>referring to a, for example, K2 GSXR1000, you appear to be making an
>>issue out of nothing.
>
>>To a lot of people, me included, the Suzuki K numbers mean nothing.
>
>Ah, but has Bruce, or anyone else, just referred to a "K2" without the
>attendent "GSX-R 1000"? Or where the context of "GSX-R 1000" wasn't
>already obvious? I don't think so.

And in any case this _is_ a bike group, where it might, in context, be
expected that the readers would be familiar with bike models.

From: Jim on
On 14/07/10 16:46, Ace wrote:
>>>> I believe he crammed it into a BMW E36.....
>>>
>>> ???
>>
>> To get it home.... I know he took it away in some incredibly unlikely
>> car.
>
> Tell me, does your use of geeky terms like E36 make you feel superior,
> or is it really totally unconscious? I do feel that it might have been
> more understood if you'd just said 3-series, or whatever it actually
> referred to.

Is this the same as you referring to your Passat as an R36?
From: Ace on
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:06 +0100, Jim <nul(a)0.0.0.0> wrote:

>On 14/07/10 16:46, Ace wrote:
>>>>> I believe he crammed it into a BMW E36.....
>>>>
>>>> ???
>>>
>>> To get it home.... I know he took it away in some incredibly unlikely
>>> car.
>>
>> Tell me, does your use of geeky terms like E36 make you feel superior,
>> or is it really totally unconscious? I do feel that it might have been
>> more understood if you'd just said 3-series, or whatever it actually
>> referred to.
>
>Is this the same as you referring to your Passat as an R36?

No. That's what the model is called, not just a codename/number. The
only badges on it say VW and R36. It's like referring to a M3, as in
another extant thread. We know that an M3 is a 3-series, just as we
know that the R36 is a Passat.

HTH.

Nice bait, BTW. Tasty.