From: BT Humble on
Kevin Gleeson wrote:
> What scares me is the above is so true ...

Welcome to hell. Here's your accordian.


BTH

--
Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Kevin Gleeson on
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC),
YnRAaHVtYmxldG93bi5vcmc=(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au (BT Humble)
wrote:

>Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>> What scares me is the above is so true ...
>
>Welcome to hell. Here's your accordian.

Thanks. It'll go well with my banjo.

--
Kev
From: G-S on
On 25/06/10 4:00 PM, Kevin Gleeson wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC),
> YnRAaHVtYmxldG93bi5vcmc=(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au (BT Humble)
> wrote:
>
>> Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>>> What scares me is the above is so true ...
>>
>> Welcome to hell. Here's your accordian.
>
> Thanks. It'll go well with my banjo.
>
> --
> Kev

Don't leave it in the car by itself...

someone will break into your car...

..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

and leave another Banjo!



G-S
From: George W Frost on

"G-S" <geoff(a)castbus.com.au> wrote in message
news:4c2467e4$0$28641$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> On 25/06/10 4:00 PM, Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC),
>> YnRAaHVtYmxldG93bi5vcmc=(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au (BT Humble)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>>>> What scares me is the above is so true ...
>>>
>>> Welcome to hell. Here's your accordian.
>>
>> Thanks. It'll go well with my banjo.
>>
>> --
>> Kev
>
> Don't leave it in the car by itself...
>
> someone will break into your car...
>
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
>
> and leave another Banjo!
>
>
>
> G-S


well, you wont be able to blame me for that one,
My surname is Frost
Not Formby


From: Lars Chance on
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
> In aus.motorcycles on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:27:40 +1000
> Nev.. <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote:
>> On 10/06/2010 4:35 PM, CrazyCam wrote:
>>
>>> Nobody NEEDS a motorcycle with over 1800cc.
>>>
>>> They may well want one, but then they can pay, even more, for the
>>> privilege.
>> Who cares about the capacity? Shouldn't the premium reflect the risk?
>
> As it's about 3rd party injuries, the premium should be the same for
> all pillion bikes, which should be about twice that of bikes that
> can't take pillions, and probably 1/10th of the premium for a small
> car.
>
Agreed except that non-pillion no-one on the bike (just third parties)
while pillion-bikes cover a person on the bike. I know there's an
element of "victim pays" but that's why pillion is many-times more than
twice non-pillion.
--
Elsie.