NSW/SYD: banning colours
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: New mid-week ambiguious jokes and if you don't like them, fuckoff
Next: No helmet legal for Unicycle rider?
From: George W. Frost on 18 Jan 2008 04:47 "Damien" <al.qaeda(a)asio.gov.au> wrote in message news:fmp792$hu3$1(a)aioe.org... > George W. Frost wrote: > >> Could also be that Damien could have been walking through the Cairns >> shopping centre >> and the looks were not of disgust, but amazement because of the heat > > George, we're not all like you, don't forget that. :-) Thank christ for that last thing that I would want is to have an arguement with myself Then again, maybe I would no I wouldn't, I might lose
From: George W. Frost on 18 Jan 2008 04:50 "JL" <jlittler(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message news:c98284b5-addd-40b3-807d-d1b4cd41bf03(a)p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Jan 18, 1:52 pm, "George W. Frost" <fro...(a)iceworks.org> wrote: > "JL" <jlitt...(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message > It's just as plausible a scenario as the Damien "the world is caving > in every biker will be banned from every pub in Australia" version. > > I don't know which will happen, but I'm betting on the latter. > > The HA could also turn up with their red "81" shirt > which knuckle dragging bouncer would know what that meant? It's scary that I'm agreeing with you on something, but yes, I suspect the key knowledge gap isn't going to be who *isn't* someone on the banned list, I suspect it's going to be who SHOULD be refused and isn't going to be. JL Christ John don't start agreeing with me, others will start talking
From: bikerbetty on 18 Jan 2008 06:09 "GB" <gb0807(a)kickindanuts.threefiddy.com> wrote in message news:13p118f2k6ub7c9(a)corp.supernews.com... > CrazyCam <crazycam(a)upturnet.com.au> wrote in > news:478fbff6$0$13262$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au: >> It's like this John, if you, or GB, go into a complicated explanation, >> with quotes, footnotes, and commentaries, I can read the bits I want >> and then skip to next. > > tl;dr > > > GB > Right, quick aside here, sorry..... tl? dr?? My net-illiteracy is showing, I know.... same thing when Gerry says that thing that he often says, what is it?- g,d,r ??? Please???? some kind soul....heeelp! I am in need of enlightenment in order to enjoy the total usenet experience <snigger> betty
From: Damien on 18 Jan 2008 08:42 GB wrote: > Johno <varcs45(a)msn.com> wrote in news:pj9uo3t6irlf2vkav1r1p6g95rtpfct9ar@ > 4ax.com: >> but we are not the 51st state of seppoland. > > Yes we are! (And we remain so until the new parliament sits and > KRudd sets it right. > > >> So COLOUR is correct > > Much as it pains me to agree with Frosty, he's right in this instance. > > > > GB Your comment is yet another example of a sadly widespread lack of knowledge of the history of our own language and culture. Not that it generally suits popular stereotypes to admit such things. After all, if people didn't have what they thought was a good excuse to beat up on the yanks, what would they do with their time then?
From: Damien on 18 Jan 2008 08:45
GB wrote: > "corks" <trigarti67(a)nospam.iinet.net.au> wrote in > news:478fec92$0$30825$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au: >> welll, for starters alot have done time > > You of all people ought to know that's not admissable > at trial. > > > GB I don't think such technicalities really bother him all that much, from the many similar comments he has made. He must really miss the "good old days". |