Prev: Ausmoto MotoGP tipping comp
Next: Fire !
From: theo on 27 Jul 2010 00:32 On Jul 27, 5:20 am, CrazyCam <Crazy...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > Once, back in the mists of antiquity, or rather the days of 2JJ, in > Sydney, I phoned in to a discussion about electoral reform. > > I explained that the problem was that folk could stand for election too > easily, and that changing the rules so the winner in an election is > elected, but the losers all get taken out and shot would improve the > quality and commitment of those standing for election. Isn't that the way it works in a lot of countries? Singapore, Indonesia, most of Africa and South America? Except in countries that have things the USA wants and then the winner or loser gets shot (with the assistance of the CIA) depending on whether they comply with the USA's wishes. Theo
From: Marts on 27 Jul 2010 23:38 Nev.. wrote... > Just as a matter of interest, from an interstater who really doesn't > care how much you pay for, since the government privatised the CTP and > lets other companies set the rates, why is the government behind held > responsible for increases in the rates? If the insurance companies are > colluding to increase prices accross the goard, shouldn't you be > petitioning the ACCC to enforce competition and investigate > non-competitive pricing? Don't they have a government authority in NSW that oversees such charges? We have an Essential Services Commission here in Victoria that regulates energy prices. Oh wait, that's not a good example...
From: Nev.. on 28 Jul 2010 05:40 On 28/07/2010 1:38 PM, Marts wrote: > Nev.. wrote... > >> Just as a matter of interest, from an interstater who really doesn't >> care how much you pay for, since the government privatised the CTP and >> lets other companies set the rates, why is the government behind held >> responsible for increases in the rates? If the insurance companies are >> colluding to increase prices accross the goard, shouldn't you be >> petitioning the ACCC to enforce competition and investigate >> non-competitive pricing? > > Don't they have a government authority in NSW that oversees such charges? We > have an Essential Services Commission here in Victoria that regulates energy > prices. > > Oh wait, that's not a good example... Heh. I paid my last electricity bill this week. Sometime in the next few weeks I get a bi-directional meter installed. Nev.. '08 DL1000K8
From: Moike on 28 Jul 2010 07:42 Nev.. wrote: > On 28/07/2010 1:38 PM, Marts wrote: >> Nev.. wrote... >> >>> Just as a matter of interest, from an interstater who really doesn't >>> care how much you pay for, since the government privatised the CTP and >>> lets other companies set the rates, why is the government behind held >>> responsible for increases in the rates? If the insurance companies are >>> colluding to increase prices accross the goard, shouldn't you be >>> petitioning the ACCC to enforce competition and investigate >>> non-competitive pricing? >> >> Don't they have a government authority in NSW that oversees such >> charges? We >> have an Essential Services Commission here in Victoria that regulates >> energy >> prices. >> >> Oh wait, that's not a good example... > > Heh. I paid my last electricity bill this week. Sometime in the next > few weeks I get a bi-directional meter installed. > > Nev.. > '08 DL1000K8 It seems to work. I've paid nothing for electricity since february. I suspect it has more to do with the ineptitude of my electrickery "supplier" in getting their act together than the sheer power of My 1KW solar system. Moike
From: CrazyCam on 28 Jul 2010 17:55
Nev.. wrote: <snip> > Heh. I paid my last electricity bill this week. Sometime in the next > few weeks I get a bi-directional meter installed. It appears that the old-fashioned, spinning disc type meter is actually bi-directional. When nothing much electrical is running in the house, and the new solar panels can see the sun, the disc turns slowly backwards. :-) We are just waiting on the new, meter to measure input to grid. regards, CrazyCam |