From: Timo at Work on
On Jul 29, 1:37 pm, "Krusty" <dontwant...(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> eatmorepies wrote:
>
> > "ginge" <the.gingeREM...(a)THISgmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:kqm356t06pffgvrhvbtjgdm5tm9pdjpqnh(a)4ax.com...
> > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
> > ><salad.dod...(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>
> > > > What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>
> > > i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750  (more spensiv, but betterer)
>
> > > 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)
>
> > I've got 4 GB RAM in an XP machine and if I try to alter large areas
> > of a picture with 'content aware healing brush' Adobe CS5 tells me
> > that it's run out of RAM. I'm looking at a new machine - unless
> > someone can show me how to get XP to see more RAM.
>
> Add /3GB to the boot.ini.  Google is your friend if that makes no sense..

That's not exactly going to help much in SD's scenario with the
graphics card being the culprit.
From: frag on
In article <i2shm8$142$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk says...
>
> Salad Dodger <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
> > What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
> >
> > Due to a gift I've received, I'd like summat with a PCI x16 slot,
> > whatever one of those is.
> >
> > And all the RAM I can eat. I've no idea why, other than more is
> > better, obviously.
> >
> > I'm currently sporting:
> >
> > Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 2.4GHz, on GA81865GME mobo wiv 2 Gig of RAM (don't
> > know what type) and an NVidia GeForce 6600 graphics card.
> >
> > It scores 3.8 on that Win7 Experience index.
> >
> > Worth a whole new PC, or a bit of jiggery-pokery inside? New mobo?
> > More RAM
> >
> > I need a new post thing to attach the CPU heatsink/fan to the mobo
> > anyway. One of those push, click and twist jobbies.
> >
> > I presume these are available separately?
>
> I've just supplied a Core i5 with 4GB ram and an intel HD graphics chipset.
> One has to admit to a degree of envy, it makes everything happen pretty
> quickly.

This laptop is a Core i7, 4GB of RAM, ATI HD 4830 GFX. It does go like
the clappers but gets rather toasty.

If using it on your lap for more than half an hour (doing intensive
tasks) you really need something inbetween you and it!


--
frag

MicroPlanet Gravity Newsreader V3.0 http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/
From: Champ on
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:30:44 -0700 (PDT), Timo at Work
<timohg(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jul 29, 1:37�pm, "Krusty" <dontwant...(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote:

>> Add /3GB to the boot.ini. �Google is your friend if that makes no sense.

>That's not exactly going to help much in SD's scenario with the
>graphics card being the culprit.

Had Krusty been replying to SD, your post might make some sense.
--
Champ
We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.
ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo
neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Hog on
frag <news4(a)ukrm.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <i2shm8$142$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk says...
>>
>> Salad Dodger <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>>> What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>>>
>>> Due to a gift I've received, I'd like summat with a PCI x16 slot,
>>> whatever one of those is.
>>>
>>> And all the RAM I can eat. I've no idea why, other than more is
>>> better, obviously.
>>>
>>> I'm currently sporting:
>>>
>>> Core 2 Duo E2160 @ 2.4GHz, on GA81865GME mobo wiv 2 Gig of RAM
>>> (don't know what type) and an NVidia GeForce 6600 graphics card.
>>>
>>> It scores 3.8 on that Win7 Experience index.
>>>
>>> Worth a whole new PC, or a bit of jiggery-pokery inside? New mobo?
>>> More RAM
>>>
>>> I need a new post thing to attach the CPU heatsink/fan to the mobo
>>> anyway. One of those push, click and twist jobbies.
>>>
>>> I presume these are available separately?
>>
>> I've just supplied a Core i5 with 4GB ram and an intel HD graphics
>> chipset. One has to admit to a degree of envy, it makes everything
>> happen pretty quickly.
>
> This laptop is a Core i7, 4GB of RAM, ATI HD 4830 GFX. It does go like
> the clappers but gets rather toasty.
>
> If using it on your lap for more than half an hour (doing intensive
> tasks) you really need something inbetween you and it!

i7 laptop! not quite Eee battery life then

--
Hog


From: Kevin Gleeson on
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:33:59 +0100, "eatmorepies"
<jckipper(a)lineone.net> wrote:

>
>"ginge" <the.gingeREMOVE(a)THISgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:kqm356t06pffgvrhvbtjgdm5tm9pdjpqnh(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
>> <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>>
>>
>> i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750 (more spensiv, but betterer)
>>
>> 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)
>
>I've got 4 GB RAM in an XP machine and if I try to alter large areas of a
>picture with 'content aware healing brush' Adobe CS5 tells me that it's run
>out of RAM. I'm looking at a new machine - unless someone can show me how to
>get XP to see more RAM.

Unless you go 64 bit, XP will not see more than 4 Gig of RAM and
realistically it will only see 3 Gig. You can set a flag in your
boot.ini that will display 4 Gig but that last Gig will only be used
by core processes, not by applications. It doesn't hurt to set up the
/3G flag as that directs that RAM to be used by said core processes,
but to be quite honest if your are pushing limits on CS anyway, you
probably won't notice a lot of difference.

--
Kev