From: ogden on
ginge wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
> <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>
> >What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>
>
> i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750 (more spensiv, but betterer)

This i7 920 still seems to be running well 18 months on.


> 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)

12 GB here, and could use more.

--
ogden | gsxr1000 | ktm duke 2
From: ginge on
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:08:48 +0100, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> wrote:

>ginge wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
>> <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>>
>>
>> i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750 (more spensiv, but betterer)
>
>This i7 920 still seems to be running well 18 months on.

Overkill for Dodger.


>> 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)
>
>12 GB here, and could use more.

I'd hazard a guess that's because you're running multiple VMs, rather
than mostly doing desktoppy type stuff.
From: ogden on
ginge wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:08:48 +0100, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> wrote:
>
> >ginge wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
> >> <salad.dodger(a)idnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
> >>
> >>
> >> i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750 (more spensiv, but betterer)
> >
> >This i7 920 still seems to be running well 18 months on.
>
> Overkill for Dodger.

Overkill for anyone.

> >> 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)
> >
> >12 GB here, and could use more.
>
> I'd hazard a guess that's because you're running multiple VMs, rather
> than mostly doing desktoppy type stuff.

Well, occasionally it's been known to run two domain controllers, two
mailbox servers, two CAS/HT servers, two DPM servers and a couple of
clients. And a router. And my usual Linux VM.

But other than that, it's just desktoppy type stuff.

--
ogden | gsxr1000 | ktm duke 2
From: Brownz on
On 29 July, 21:33, "eatmorepies" <jckip...(a)lineone.net> wrote:
> "ginge" <the.gingeREM...(a)THISgmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:kqm356t06pffgvrhvbtjgdm5tm9pdjpqnh(a)4ax.com...
>
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:21 +0100, Salad Dodger
> > <salad.dod...(a)idnet.com> wrote:
>
> >>What's the processor of choice nowadays? 486/50 or 66?
>
> > i3 530 (cheap) or i5 750  (more spensiv, but betterer)
>
> > 4 GB RAM (enough for anything desktoppy)
>
> I've got 4 GB RAM in an XP machine and if I try to alter large areas of a
> picture with 'content aware healing brush' Adobe CS5 tells me that it's run
> out of RAM. I'm looking at a new machine - unless someone can show me how to
> get XP to see more RAM.
>

Better off with a dedicated Quadro or FirePro vga card for CS5, summat
with a large amount of frame buffer memory makes life a lot more
pleasant.

<Pats box with Quadro 6000 that is currently sat on the desk doing
nowt.... 6GB of FBM and 448Cuda Cores, I really must plug it into
something and fire up seti>

From: Hog on
Ben <ben(a)bensalesDOTME.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:48:03 +0100, "Hog"
> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> frag <news4(a)ukrm.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>> This laptop is a Core i7, 4GB of RAM, ATI HD 4830 GFX. It does go
>>> like the clappers but gets rather toasty.
>>>
>>> If using it on your lap for more than half an hour (doing intensive
>>> tasks) you really need something inbetween you and it!
>>
>> i7 laptop! not quite Eee battery life then
>
> Mine is pretty good[1]. At max performance I get 3 hours from the
> battery.
>
> Despite the 8Gb ram and the i7, it still feels slower on Win 7 than my
> Core 2 Duo 2.4 Macbook Pro.
>
>
>
> [1] Thinkpad T510

I grump if I get less than 7 hours

--
Hog