From: Lookout on
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:13:58 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
<hot-ham-and-cheese(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 18, 4:07�pm, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:39:23 -0400, Frank
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <frankperiodlogu...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> >On 6/18/2010 1:01 PM, Lookout wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne
>> >> <tonnewalt...(a)gmail.com> �wrote:
>>
>> >>> Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of
>> >>> '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is
>> >>> following the plan of Cloward& �Piven, two professors at Columbia
>> >>> University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming
>> >>> the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up
>> >>> the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a
>> >>> whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United
>> >>> States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that
>> >>> desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to
>> >>> always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no
>> >>> responsibility to pay for it.
>>
>> >>> -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do
>> >>> with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of
>> >>> hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000
>> >>> new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama
>> >>> doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will
>> >>> add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it
>> >>> cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big
>> >>> government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless
>> >>> spending bill in the middle of a depression?
>>
>> >>> -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do
>> >>> with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.
>> >>> It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government
>> >>> control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest
>> >>> contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like
>> >>> GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support
>> >>> everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of
>> >>> dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep
>> >>> them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with
>> >>> bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the
>> >>> wealth around."
>>
>> >>> -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's
>> >>> asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government
>> >>> entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not
>> >>> American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal
>> >>> is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a
>> >>> million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.
>>
>> >>> -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12
>> >>> million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm
>> >>> the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new
>> >>> Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add
>> >>> another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children,
>> >>> food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and
>> >>> eventually Social Security
>>
>> >>> From BP message site at Yahoo!Finance.
>>
>> >>> walter
>>
>> >> Who cares what one of his classmates think? Do all your classmates
>> >> agree with you?
>>
>> >Who needs a classmate to tell us what Obama is up to? �Been pretty clear
>> >to me.
>>
>> I agree. Few surprises at all although he's done better than I thought
>> he would.-
>
>Then our nation is truly doomed.

HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser.
From: Cicero Venatio on

>> Then our nation is truly doomed.
>
> HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser.
----------
A loser is what O thinks you are, and you obviously agree.
From: Lookout on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:51:25 -0700, Cicero Venatio
<jazzyboss(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>>> Then our nation is truly doomed.
>>
>> HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser.
>----------
>A loser is what O thinks you are, and you obviously agree.

He doesn't know me. You're lying again.
From: ""Gentleman"Dave" on

"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vekn16d618ajtsh92mbe30g1hpelk2vj59(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:39:23 -0400, Frank
> <frankperiodlogullo(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>On 6/18/2010 1:01 PM, Lookout wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne
>>> <tonnewalt487(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of
>>>> '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is
>>>> following the plan of Cloward& Piven, two professors at Columbia
>>>> University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming
>>>> the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up
>>>> the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a
>>>> whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United
>>>> States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that
>>>> desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to
>>>> always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no
>>>> responsibility to pay for it.
>>>>
>>>> -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do
>>>> with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of
>>>> hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000
>>>> new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama
>>>> doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will
>>>> add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it
>>>> cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big
>>>> government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless
>>>> spending bill in the middle of a depression?
>>>>
>>>> -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do
>>>> with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.
>>>> It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government
>>>> control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest
>>>> contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like
>>>> GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support
>>>> everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of
>>>> dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep
>>>> them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with
>>>> bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the
>>>> wealth around."
>>>>
>>>> -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's
>>>> asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government
>>>> entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not
>>>> American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal
>>>> is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a
>>>> million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.
>>>>
>>>> -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12
>>>> million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm
>>>> the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new
>>>> Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add
>>>> another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children,
>>>> food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and
>>>> eventually Social Security
>>>>
>>>> From BP message site at Yahoo!Finance.
>>>>
>>>> walter
>>>
>>> Who cares what one of his classmates think? Do all your classmates
>>> agree with you?
>>
>>Who needs a classmate to tell us what Obama is up to? Been pretty clear
>>to me.
>
> I agree. Few surprises at all although he's done better than I thought
> he would.

Please define "better"


From: Jinks on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:29:13 -0500, "\"Gentleman\"Dave"
<warpath(a)centurytel.net> wrote:

<snip>
>Please define "better"
>

Get the cross postin' fucks to do it on the other groups!

Jinks ('86FXRS, '07FLTR)
#64
Remember, "No good deed goes unpunished"