From: Lookout on 18 Jun 2010 21:28 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:13:58 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-cheese(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 18, 4:07�pm, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:39:23 -0400, Frank >> >> >> >> >> >> <frankperiodlogu...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >On 6/18/2010 1:01 PM, Lookout wrote: >> >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne >> >> <tonnewalt...(a)gmail.com> �wrote: >> >> >>> Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of >> >>> '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is >> >>> following the plan of Cloward& �Piven, two professors at Columbia >> >>> University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming >> >>> the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up >> >>> the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a >> >>> whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United >> >>> States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that >> >>> desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to >> >>> always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no >> >>> responsibility to pay for it. >> >> >>> -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do >> >>> with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of >> >>> hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 >> >>> new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama >> >>> doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will >> >>> add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it >> >>> cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big >> >>> government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless >> >>> spending bill in the middle of a depression? >> >> >>> -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do >> >>> with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. >> >>> It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government >> >>> control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest >> >>> contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like >> >>> GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support >> >>> everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of >> >>> dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep >> >>> them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with >> >>> bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the >> >>> wealth around." >> >> >>> -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's >> >>> asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government >> >>> entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not >> >>> American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal >> >>> is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a >> >>> million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government. >> >> >>> -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 >> >>> million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm >> >>> the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new >> >>> Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add >> >>> another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, >> >>> food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and >> >>> eventually Social Security >> >> >>> From BP message site at Yahoo!Finance. >> >> >>> walter >> >> >> Who cares what one of his classmates think? Do all your classmates >> >> agree with you? >> >> >Who needs a classmate to tell us what Obama is up to? �Been pretty clear >> >to me. >> >> I agree. Few surprises at all although he's done better than I thought >> he would.- > >Then our nation is truly doomed. HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser.
From: Cicero Venatio on 19 Jun 2010 06:51 >> Then our nation is truly doomed. > > HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser. ---------- A loser is what O thinks you are, and you obviously agree.
From: Lookout on 19 Jun 2010 10:17 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:51:25 -0700, Cicero Venatio <jazzyboss(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> Then our nation is truly doomed. >> >> HAHHAHAH Not at all, loser. >---------- >A loser is what O thinks you are, and you obviously agree. He doesn't know me. You're lying again.
From: ""Gentleman"Dave" on 19 Jun 2010 12:29 "Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:vekn16d618ajtsh92mbe30g1hpelk2vj59(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:39:23 -0400, Frank > <frankperiodlogullo(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>On 6/18/2010 1:01 PM, Lookout wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne >>> <tonnewalt487(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of >>>> '83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is >>>> following the plan of Cloward& Piven, two professors at Columbia >>>> University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming >>>> the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up >>>> the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a >>>> whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United >>>> States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that >>>> desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to >>>> always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no >>>> responsibility to pay for it. >>>> >>>> -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do >>>> with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of >>>> hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 >>>> new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama >>>> doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will >>>> add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it >>>> cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big >>>> government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless >>>> spending bill in the middle of a depression? >>>> >>>> -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do >>>> with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. >>>> It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government >>>> control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest >>>> contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like >>>> GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support >>>> everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of >>>> dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep >>>> them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with >>>> bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the >>>> wealth around." >>>> >>>> -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's >>>> asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government >>>> entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not >>>> American taxpayers. But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal >>>> is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a >>>> million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government. >>>> >>>> -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 >>>> million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm >>>> the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new >>>> Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add >>>> another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, >>>> food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and >>>> eventually Social Security >>>> >>>> From BP message site at Yahoo!Finance. >>>> >>>> walter >>> >>> Who cares what one of his classmates think? Do all your classmates >>> agree with you? >> >>Who needs a classmate to tell us what Obama is up to? Been pretty clear >>to me. > > I agree. Few surprises at all although he's done better than I thought > he would. Please define "better"
From: Jinks on 19 Jun 2010 15:14 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:29:13 -0500, "\"Gentleman\"Dave" <warpath(a)centurytel.net> wrote: <snip> >Please define "better" > Get the cross postin' fucks to do it on the other groups! Jinks ('86FXRS, '07FLTR) #64 Remember, "No good deed goes unpunished"
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: German student attacks Hell's Angels with puppy Next: Life in the fast lane - sort of.... |