Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: atec 77 ""atec77 " on 15 Feb 2007 22:00 Boxer wrote: > So how much extra fuel would I be using by having my car air-conditioner set > at 23 degrees rather than 24 degrees ? > > Boxer > > That all depends on how much current the flux capacitor has stored .
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 22:12 Boxer wrote: > So how much extra fuel would I be using by having my car > air-conditioner set at 23 degrees rather than 24 degrees ? You are wasting a lot of extra fuel. You should be on your bike! Theo
From: Nev.. on 15 Feb 2007 22:25 Theo Bekkers wrote: > Boxer wrote: > >> So how much extra fuel would I be using by having my car >> air-conditioner set at 23 degrees rather than 24 degrees ? > > You are wasting a lot of extra fuel. You should be on your bike! The aircon on my bike is currently set at 33�C.. so if I am in my car with the aircon set at 23� I'd be saving a lot of fuel, right? Nev.. '04 CBR1100XX
From: Boxer on 15 Feb 2007 22:41 "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message news:45d52422$0$24735$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > Theo Bekkers wrote: >> Boxer wrote: >> >>> So how much extra fuel would I be using by having my car >>> air-conditioner set at 23 degrees rather than 24 degrees ? >> >> You are wasting a lot of extra fuel. You should be on your bike! > > The aircon on my bike is currently set at 33�C.. so if I am in my car with > the aircon set at 23� I'd be saving a lot of fuel, right? > > Nev.. > '04 CBR1100XX An engine is designed to work efficiently with a certain amount of load so perhaps driving with the air conditioner on is more efficient (and with the windows up less drag) than with it switched off. Boxer
From: Andrew McKenna on 15 Feb 2007 23:22
Knobdoodle wrote: > P'raps it's in the vain hope that someone will actually have the spine to > admit they were wrong about that unnecessary-headlights-don't-waste-fuel > stuff..... > Eh Hammo? > Eh Nev? > Eh Andrew? Oi, don't you go dragging me into that camp. I repeatedly said more lights need more energy. All I claimed was that adding electrical demand could not by itself increase mechanical load; something has to decide to supply more mechanical effort to satisfy the electrical demand, or to leave the demand unsatisfied. That something (in the simple example I used) was the person pedalling the push-bike. Everything I've read since confirms your viewpoint, not mine, but since I still don't understand it I'm holding off admitting error. -- Cheers Andrew (Checks temperature reading of Hell: still a toasty 400 degrees C) |