P plate training ...not
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: sharkey on 17 Feb 2007 22:45 Andrew McKenna <NOcmorSPAM3047(a)NObigpond.SPAMnet.au> wrote: > Knobdoodle wrote: > > Now I thought that the magnetic field offered up by the static magnets > was fixed, and the amount of current in the system was determined solely > by the speed the squirrel cage rotates within that field. The _voltage_ is determined by the rate the magnets are spinning at. The _current_ is what causes the torque effect. The _power_ is voltage * current. When you're drawing no power, no current is flowing, so there's no back-torque. -----sharks -- Du verschwendest �bertragungskapazit�ten.
From: Dale Porter on 17 Feb 2007 23:27 "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote in message news:slrnetfitt.vn0.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org... > Andrew McKenna <NOcmorSPAM3047(a)NObigpond.SPAMnet.au> wrote: >> Knobdoodle wrote: >> >> Now I thought that the magnetic field offered up by the static magnets >> was fixed, and the amount of current in the system was determined solely >> by the speed the squirrel cage rotates within that field. > > The _voltage_ is determined by the rate the magnets are spinning at. > The _current_ is what causes the torque effect. > The _power_ is voltage * current. When you're drawing no power, no > current is flowing, so there's no back-torque. > > But this NG is full of people that torque back. -- Dale Porter GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J
From: Theo Bekkers on 18 Feb 2007 18:07 Hammo wrote: > I don't follow the logic. No, you don't. You prefer to go off at tangents. Theo
From: Theo Bekkers on 18 Feb 2007 18:08 Hammo wrote: > "Dale Porter" <daleaporter(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I'll assume you were actually meaning to reply to Clem there. > I don't follow the logic and this should have been kept offline. I > find the insinuations despicable. Sounds like you're trying to elicit guilt Hamish. Theo
From: Tim Moran on 19 Feb 2007 03:43
In article <RWCzh.6072$sd2.1804(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au>, knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com says... > > "the inefficiencies of the internal combustion engine."?!!? > What the hell has that got to do with the fuel waste through unnecessary use > of driving lights? (or the inaccuracies of trip computers?) Is that what the argument is about? Now I need to work out who's on what side |