From: Nev.. on
Knobdoodle wrote:
> "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message
> news:45c918aa$0$25300$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> GB wrote:
>>> "Mad-Biker" <mad-biker(a)westnet(Panties).com.au> wrote in
>>> news:45c7e78c$0$1028$61c65585(a)un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.
>>> au:
>>>> much like air conditioning, the alternator still turns over at a
>>>> constant rate no matter how much power your draining!
>>> OK, do me a favour. Go out to the shed, fire up your car and let
>>> it idle. make a note of where the tacho needle is sitting. Now, turn
>>> the lights on, full christmas tree, high beams, the works. Make a note of
>>> where the tacho needle is sitting now.
>> I hope you're not suggesting that it will move, because that will blow the
>> original "uses more fuel" argument out of the water...
>>
> Eh?
> It'll show that there's more load and that equivalent throttle settings
> result in lower revs...

and at lower revs the engine would surely consume less fuel, not more :)

Nev..
'04 CBR1100XX
From: Nev.. on
Toosmoky wrote:
> Nev.. wrote:
>
>> I know in new Commodores (and I presume other production cars as
>> well), whenever the airbags are deployed, the doors all automatically
>> unlock, and the interior light turns on.
>
> In BMWs, the windows also drop two inches so the pressure increase
> inside the car when the airbags deploy doesn't blow them (or your
> eardrums) out, the battery leads sever themselves with a pyrotechnic
> charge and the car calls BMW for help.

Can they really drop the windows in 0.04 sec?

Nev..
'04 CBR1100XX
From: Dale Porter on
"Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message news:45c95f2b$0$25333$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> Knobdoodle wrote:
>> "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message news:45c918aa$0$25300$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>> GB wrote:
>>>> "Mad-Biker" <mad-biker(a)westnet(Panties).com.au> wrote in
>>>> news:45c7e78c$0$1028$61c65585(a)un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.
>>>> au:
>>>>> much like air conditioning, the alternator still turns over at a
>>>>> constant rate no matter how much power your draining!
>>>> OK, do me a favour. Go out to the shed, fire up your car and let
>>>> it idle. make a note of where the tacho needle is sitting. Now, turn
>>>> the lights on, full christmas tree, high beams, the works. Make a note of where the tacho needle is sitting now.
>>> I hope you're not suggesting that it will move, because that will blow the original "uses more fuel" argument out of the
>>> water...
>>>
>> Eh?
>> It'll show that there's more load and that equivalent throttle settings result in lower revs...
>
> and at lower revs the engine would surely consume less fuel, not more :)
>
>

Only at idle without touching the throttle settings. But of course if you actually wish to drive the car, you will need to provide
more fuel than normal to acheive the same motivation results as you did before putting more load on the system and engine.

--
Dale Porter
GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J


From: Dale Porter on
Think of it another way. Say you're on a health kick (YR!) and you're peddling away on an excercise bike. You have it set at a
fairly low friction setting and are just peddling slowly. To peddle faster you apply more energy through your legs. However,
increase the load via the friction setting and you need to use more energy to maintain the same speed.

--
Dale Porter
GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J


From: Hammo on



On 7/2/07 3:01 PM, in article jacyh.3945$sd2.174(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au,
"Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote in message
> news:45c918aa$0$25300$5a62ac22(a)per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> GB wrote:
>>> "Mad-Biker" <mad-biker(a)westnet(Panties).com.au> wrote in
>>> news:45c7e78c$0$1028$61c65585(a)un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.
>>> au:
>>>> much like air conditioning, the alternator still turns over at a
>>>> constant rate no matter how much power your draining!
>>>
>>> OK, do me a favour. Go out to the shed, fire up your car and let
>>> it idle. make a note of where the tacho needle is sitting. Now, turn
>>> the lights on, full christmas tree, high beams, the works. Make a note of
>>> where the tacho needle is sitting now.
>>
>> I hope you're not suggesting that it will move, because that will blow the
>> original "uses more fuel" argument out of the water...
>>
> Eh?
> It'll show that there's more load and that equivalent throttle settings
> result in lower revs.
> Therefore you would draw the conclusion that a higher throttle setting would
> be required to maintain the same revs and thus more fuel would be used in
> any comparable situation.
>
> What's the logic behind your "blows .. argument out of the water"?

Er, no.

The statement was that lights waste fuel.

I have yet to see that it does.

Hammo

(...blinded by the obvious?)

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?