From: Hammo on



On 8/2/07 11:07 PM, in article
2oEyh.4648$sd2.1013(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Boxer"
<someone(a)nowhere.com> wrote:

>
> "sharkey" <sharkey(a)zoic.org> wrote in message
> news:slrneslt22.4jo.sharkey(a)anchovy.zoic.org...
>> Nev.. <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Enough of the silly monkeys. Just explain whatever it is you are
>>> avoiding. How does the engine management computer figure out the fuel
>>> flow rate?
>>
>> On an EFI car, it _causes_ the fuel flow rate ... you can calculate it
>> from the (fuel rail pressure - the manifold pressure) * (injector open
>> time - fudge factor).
>>
>> -----sharks
>> --
>> Du verschwendest �bertragungskapazit�ten.
>
> I thought it was injection pulses.

Goes to insert joke (and thinks better of it).

Hammo

....it's all about me!!

From: Knobdoodle on

"Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote:
> Ok so I tested it myself.
>
> 5.7 Lt EFI Holden in diagnostics mode.
> All Lights off idle speed ~803
> All Lights on idle speed ~803
> All lights off fuel rate 2.68L/hr
> All lights on fuel rate 2.68L/hr
>
Hey Nev; what's it do when the air is switched on?
Does the idle drop or stay the same?
Of course aircon is a much larger load than just headlights but it might
indicate if your engine computer is automatically compensating or not.
--
Clem


From: Knobdoodle on

"Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:C1F0BE07.10E7E%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au...
>
>
>
> On 8/2/07 8:23 AM, in article 12skgrpblqagfc4(a)corp.supernews.com, "GB"
> <gb0506(a)kickindanuts.threefiddy.com> wrote:
>
>> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>> PS I just tried it in my car and it used no fuel for the 10 minute I
>>> had
>>> the lights on!
>>
>> How did the battery get charged up? Magic?
>>
> According to you it will be....
>
Sheesh GB; what are you a Hammo virgin?
He didn't say the battery got charged up; just that he ran the headlights
for 10 minutes and used no fuel!
(The battery will get charged up tomorrow when he runs the engine!)
--
Clem


From: Knobdoodle on

"Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote:
> I think you've been reading too many physics books and you've lost sight
> of reality. Are you saying that if I measure something once per second
> and then multiply that by 3600 my result is not an accurate measure of an
> hourly rate? Do you think the computer controlling the fuel rate just
> guesses?
>
No; it actuates the injector the exact amount that it's been told to for the
conditions it's measured.
It then displays the exact mpg (L/Hr, Km per kilojoule or whatever) that's
it's been told to display too.

But it doesn't have any idea what a litre actually is and it certainly
doean't have any ability to actually measure one!
--
Clem


From: Hammo on



On 9/2/07 12:27 AM, in article
TyFyh.4680$sd2.1497(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle"
<knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message
> news:C1F0BE07.10E7E%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/2/07 8:23 AM, in article 12skgrpblqagfc4(a)corp.supernews.com, "GB"
>> <gb0506(a)kickindanuts.threefiddy.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hammo <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote:
>>>> PS I just tried it in my car and it used no fuel for the 10 minute I
>>>> had
>>>> the lights on!
>>>
>>> How did the battery get charged up? Magic?
>>>
>> According to you it will be....
>>
> Sheesh GB; what are you a Hammo virgin?
> He didn't say the battery got charged up; just that he ran the headlights
> for 10 minutes and used no fuel!
> (The battery will get charged up tomorrow when he runs the engine!)

Yeah, what a nong!

Actually, I'm gonna use solar power!

Hammo

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?