Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: Kathryn Vickers on 10 Feb 2007 17:40 I know, but catching his attention isn't as easy as it used to be. On 10/2/07 10:10 PM, in article 45cda83f_3(a)x-privat.org, "Smee R11S" <me(a)there.net> wrote: > Kathryn Vickers wrote: >> Sing along with me now (al la Summer Holiday) >> "Hammo's playing Devil's Advocate >> Trying to get bites from one or two >> He'll keep going 'til you lose your rag with it, >> Pedantic bantering keeps him sane >> There's nothing you can do" >> >> K > > Hehehehehe > You aint half statin the obvious Nurse Vickers. > (I'm not following ths thread)
From: IK on 10 Feb 2007 17:58 atec wrote: > > Hammo wrote: > >> "Theo Bekkers" <tbekkers(a)bekkers.com.au> wrote: >> >>> Hammo wrote: >>> >>>> Actually, I'm gonna use solar power! >>> >>> Isn't petrol just very old solar power? >> >> Will I need to use synthetic or mineral oil? >> >> Hammo >> > Olive ? Leave the man out of this.
From: Dale Porter on 10 Feb 2007 19:00 "G-S" <geoff(a)castbus.com.au> wrote in message news:12ssgjljmbg0s65(a)corp.supernews.com... > jlittler(a)my-deja.com wrote: >> On Feb 10, 8:47 pm, Kathryn Vickers <iamsista...(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>> Sing along with me now (al la Summer Holiday) >>> "Hammo's playing Devil's Advocate >>> Trying to get bites from one or two >>> He'll keep going 'til you lose your rag with it, >>> Pedantic bantering keeps him sane >>> There's nothing you can do" >> >> While patently true, there's a difference between obstinately arguing >> an inaccurate, irrelevant or indefensible point and being a devil's >> advocate that Hammo always seems to miss >> > > And this is exactly the difference in style of comment between someone like Dales father and Hammo... > > And IIRC, you have experienced my father playing Devil's Advocate at some point. -- Dale Porter GPX250 -> CBR600 -> VTR1000 + VT250F-J
From: Hammo on 11 Feb 2007 00:05 On 10/2/07 11:39 PM, in article 1171111170.484658.17060(a)p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com, "jlittler(a)my-deja.com" <jlittler(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > On Feb 10, 8:47 pm, Kathryn Vickers <iamsista...(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >> Sing along with me now (al la Summer Holiday) >> "Hammo's playing Devil's Advocate >> Trying to get bites from one or two >> He'll keep going 'til you lose your rag with it, >> Pedantic bantering keeps him sane >> There's nothing you can do" > > While patently true, there's a difference between obstinately arguing > an inaccurate, irrelevant or indefensible point and being a devil's > advocate that Hammo always seems to miss No, I'm more selective with whom I play devil's advocate with. After all, this aus.moto, not real life, I *don't* need to be an advocate here. Hammo
From: Hammo on 11 Feb 2007 00:13
On 10/2/07 11:52 PM, in article 45cdc0d5$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au, "JL" <jl(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > Hammo wrote: > Snippo >> >> "No; it actuates the injector the exact amount that it's been told to for >> the conditions it's measured. It then displays the exact mpg (L/Hr, Km per >> kilojoule or whatever) that's it's been told to display too." >> >> That is from up the page! That ain't invented, and it sure aint pretend. > > Yup, so you've just quoted the bit that shows he didn't say the mpg > (etc) were measured. What's your point (1) > > JL > (1) he says knowing full well Hammo doesn't actually have one Jeez that was a low blow. I do and I have maintained it. The "volume" injected is not a random number. It will be based on parameters that are peculiar to the engine and appropriate for the required performance etc. Based on that, there *must be* with in a known error range of fuel consumed. Are we still on the same page here? Hammo I'll guffaw at your assertion that fuel pumps are not accurate, and continue to be amazed at your lack to do anything active about ensuring that the "inaccuracies" are fixed. I mean, if you can't buy fuel accurately, how the hell are you going to measure it'd consumption? |