From: jlittler on
On Feb 6, 12:19 am, "George W Frost" <fro...(a)iceworks.org> wrote:
> "alxr" <a...(a)c.d> wrote in message
> I always thought that it was an Australian design rule that Australian
> regisered cars, no matter which state you were in, bans any more than two
> headlights on when facing oncoming traffic.

It's not a design rule (how can you make a design rule about that ?)
it's a traffic law, and yes it used to be the case, no idea if it
still is - certainly no-one seems to get booked for it in Sydney.

> Pity that Shane and Spooky from the Highway patrol aren't in this newsgroup
> any more, they could shed light on this subject

No, I'm sorry, that's not even vaguely a pity, more like a cause for
celebration

JL

From: G-S on
Nev.. wrote:
>
> My alternator keeps my battery at a full charge, which means it must be
> providing more charge than I actually use, all the time, which means
> that any charge required for accessories like lights and radio is being
> produced all the time, regardless of whether or not I'm actually using
> them, which means that no more fuel is required.
>
> How's that for logic?
>
Going well until the last bit which should read... "which means that
fuel use varies partly according to alternator output" :)


G-S

From: G-S on
Nev.. wrote:
> but if the moving parts
> of the alternator are in constant motion which is determined by the
> crankshaft, and is producing a supply of electricity...

The torque required to turn the shaft of the alternator is related to
the load of the current. So when more current is produced the harder
the engine works to turn the alternator.

G-S
From: G-S on
paulh wrote:
> Running a headlight doesnt
> increase the load on the engine because the engine doesnt provide
> electricity based on demand, it provides the same amount regardless of
> load.

It produces electricity based on load demand (modified by the actual
battery capacity and storage and the generators 'size').

G-S
From: G-S on
paulh wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:49:31 GMT, "Boxer" <someone(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>> As Nev and others point out Bikes provide more than enough electricity
>>> to keep themselves charged in normal use. Running a headlight doesnt
>>> increase the load on the engine because the engine doesnt provide
>>> electricity based on demand, it provides the same amount regardless of
>>> load. Thus using a headlight uses power that would otherwise go
>>> 'wasted'.
>>>
>>> paulh
>> Where does the electricity go when it is wasted?
>
> It creates phlogiston...
>
> paulh

How very.... etheral of you...


G-S
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?