P plate training ...not
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: Knobdoodle on 14 Feb 2007 05:20 "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: > On 14/2/07 4:39 PM, in article 45d2a107$1(a)news.bekkers.com.au, "Theo > Bekkers" <tbekkers(a)bekkers.com.au> wrote: >> Do any of those systems generate power without using any fuel? > > Ok, I'd be interested to see what power, as in electrical requirements the > ignition and fuel management systems use as well as a comparo with the > size, > type and construction of the battery system. > > We haven't considered double layers and its effect on the flow of > electricity. This is more of a common problem in batteries that have a > gel > type compound, but seeing as I don't know if they are used on a 24 V > system, > we may as well check that too. > OF COURSE you'd be interest in these things Hammo; you're (apparantly) interested in all kinds of silly diversions that have no relevance to the simple point being debated! Doesn't mean anyone else should give 'em any glimmer of attention though.... > > Hammo (awaits Clem........) > I hope I didn't keep you too long. -- Clem
From: Hammo on 14 Feb 2007 05:41 On 14/2/07 9:14 PM, in article _hBAh.1019$4c6.822(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > "Hammo" <\@aapt.net.au> wrote in message > news:C1F9210B.26A7F%hbalkerjones(a)aapt.net.au... >> >> What percentage of total fuel is being "claimed" here? We are talking >> about >> thimbles gentlemens. >> > So you finally understand that fuel is being consumed by the lights but > you're try to quibble about the amount, Hammo?[1] > Jeeze; that took a while! ....we were at that stage and then it was if we can determine how much is it a waste? I still doubt that it is as high as been claimed. The numbers put forward have errors so high that makes them insignificant. If it is insignificant is it a waste? Hammo
From: Hammo on 14 Feb 2007 05:43 On 14/2/07 9:20 PM, in article lnBAh.1021$4c6.138(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >> On 14/2/07 4:39 PM, in article 45d2a107$1(a)news.bekkers.com.au, "Theo >> Bekkers" <tbekkers(a)bekkers.com.au> wrote: >>> Do any of those systems generate power without using any fuel? >> >> Ok, I'd be interested to see what power, as in electrical requirements the >> ignition and fuel management systems use as well as a comparo with the >> size, >> type and construction of the battery system. >> >> We haven't considered double layers and its effect on the flow of >> electricity. This is more of a common problem in batteries that have a >> gel >> type compound, but seeing as I don't know if they are used on a 24 V >> system, >> we may as well check that too. >> > OF COURSE you'd be interest in these things Hammo; you're (apparantly) > interested in all kinds of silly diversions that have no relevance to the > simple point being debated! > Doesn't mean anyone else should give 'em any glimmer of attention though.... >> >> Hammo (awaits Clem........) >> > I hope I didn't keep you too long. Right on time and didn't disappoint. I'm pointing out things that do have a bearing on how the load (power) is stored and released. It not one way traffic... Hammo (Bi-directional communications.....)
From: Knobdoodle on 14 Feb 2007 05:47 "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message news:C1F9326B.26AAE%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... > > > > On 14/2/07 9:14 PM, in article > _hBAh.1019$4c6.822(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" > <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> "Hammo" <\@aapt.net.au> wrote in message >> news:C1F9210B.26A7F%hbalkerjones(a)aapt.net.au... > >>> >>> What percentage of total fuel is being "claimed" here? We are talking >>> about >>> thimbles gentlemens. >>> >> So you finally understand that fuel is being consumed by the lights but >> you're try to quibble about the amount, Hammo?[1] >> Jeeze; that took a while! > > ...we were at that stage and then it was if we can determine how much is > it > a waste? I still doubt that it is as high as been claimed. > > The numbers put forward have errors so high that makes them insignificant. > If it is insignificant is it a waste? > Don't know, don't care. That's Andrew and you out of the way; only Nev left to convince! -- Clem
From: Knobdoodle on 14 Feb 2007 05:51
"Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote in message news:C1F93302.26AAF%hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au... > > > > On 14/2/07 9:20 PM, in article > lnBAh.1021$4c6.138(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Knobdoodle" > <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> "Hammo" <hbaj2006(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >>> On 14/2/07 4:39 PM, in article 45d2a107$1(a)news.bekkers.com.au, "Theo >>> Bekkers" <tbekkers(a)bekkers.com.au> wrote: >>>> Do any of those systems generate power without using any fuel? >>> >>> Ok, I'd be interested to see what power, as in electrical requirements >>> the >>> ignition and fuel management systems use as well as a comparo with the >>> size, >>> type and construction of the battery system. >>> >>> We haven't considered double layers and its effect on the flow of >>> electricity. This is more of a common problem in batteries that have a >>> gel >>> type compound, but seeing as I don't know if they are used on a 24 V >>> system, >>> we may as well check that too. >>> >> OF COURSE you'd be interest in these things Hammo; you're (apparantly) >> interested in all kinds of silly diversions that have no relevance to the >> simple point being debated! >> Doesn't mean anyone else should give 'em any glimmer of attention >> though.... >>> >>> Hammo (awaits Clem........) >>> >> I hope I didn't keep you too long. > > Right on time and didn't disappoint. > > I'm pointing out things that do have a bearing on how the load (power) is > stored and released. It not one way traffic... > Oh I don't doubt that it's all very important to YOU Hammo. It just doesn't have any relevance to the points anybody ELSE is debating! -- Clem |