Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: Aeek on 14 Feb 2007 07:19 On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:48:12 GMT, "Knobdoodle" <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >"Aeek" <aeeeeeek(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message >news:k2t5t2daal4drkcb9gptnit46n6b6bl6kb(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:32:38 GMT, "Knobdoodle" >> <knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Interesting to you. Irrelevant to anyone actually curious about >>>whether-or-not headlights use fuel. >> >> early fuel burning headlights clearly did. >> >Now THERE's a point; acetylene headlights don't cause any engine load at >all! >(Hammo will be able to prove this too as soon as he can connect his >oscilloscope to an EFI car with them) um, there's the weight of the lights and the fuel. So the load will reduce as you burn your midnight oil. I suspect the wind direction/strength would be a greater factor.
From: Yeebok on 14 Feb 2007 07:29 Lotsappl wrote: > STUFF Observable and demonstrable that electrics take a load. 1) Get a 2000 KN laser (or whatever it's called outside Australia) 2) Have the engine idling and it be nighttime 3) Have the headlights on 4) Use the electric windows or turn on the A/C 5) Headlights dim If power's being *taken* from the headlights when the system's at minimal power and something else is added (elec window), then they're using power. In some way shape or form the charge in the battery has come from the fuel in the tank, or your wallet when you paid for it.. or the Free-Stored-Electricity Fairies. There's just no such thing as a free lunch .. psst - want to buy this perpetual motion machine ?
From: Yeebok on 14 Feb 2007 07:30 Aeek wrote: > >"Aeek" <aeeeeeek(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message > >news:k2t5t2daal4drkcb9gptnit46n6b6bl6kb(a)4ax.com... > >(Hammo will be able to prove this too as soon as he can connect his > >oscilloscope to an EFI car with them) > > um, there's the weight of the lights and the fuel. So the load will > reduce as you burn your midnight oil. > I suspect the wind direction/strength would be a greater factor. Now you're just being pedantic .. but you're right ;)
From: Nev.. on 14 Feb 2007 07:57 Knobdoodle wrote: > Or GB was wrong. It's a bit late to be jumping on the bandwagon, Clem :P Nev.. '04 CBR1100XX
From: Nev.. on 14 Feb 2007 07:59
jlittler(a)my-deja.com wrote: > On Feb 14, 12:39 pm, Hammo <hbaj2...(a)aapt.net.au> wrote: >> On 14/2/07 11:58 AM, in article >> bigiain-AE5D94.11581914022...(a)nasal.pacific.net.au, "Iain Chalmers" >> Sorry to ruin the party boys.... >> >> I don't know of too many machines that "idle" every where. > > <Insert disingenous helpful look> "Boss Hoss" 5.7L V8 ? They are but a mythical being. I work just around the corner from their Australian importer, and regularly pass their premises and I'm yet to see any sign of life there. Nev.. '04 CBR1100XX |