P plate training ...not
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: new tv project
Next: Honda VTR coolant boiling ?
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 17:55 Knobdoodle wrote: > I'm voting for "Hammoflage" (meaning "true but irrelevant details > introduced into a debate in an attempt to divert the debate away from > the point you're losing") to be included in the aus.moto lexicon. > I reckon I'm on a winner too! I'm happy to adopt that.. Theo
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 17:56 Hammo wrote: > I've "landed". Will get round to it in the next while.... You have been a bit 'up in the air' lately. Theo
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 18:00 Dale Porter wrote: > "Hammo" wrote >> Feel free to engage, though I have never really had anything to talk >> to you about. > Yes, we're from two very different worlds. And that fact doesn't > upset me in the slightest. Well, I know _you're_ from earth. Hammo, I still haven't figured out. I know it's not Mars because my uncle Martin says he's never hears of him. Theo
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 18:11 Hammo wrote: > I have typed up 4 ish pages of the chemistry thus far and part of the > explanation was going to be on RON, which throws many more cats > amongst the clich�s. At least with that motor it is a well defined > in its parameters and has substantial references to its application. Your figures will show that the electrical power is immeasurable? Or free? Immeasurable only because it is so small as a percentage of fuel use that nobody cares in that vehicular system? Does that mean it is zero? I think not. My domestic electricity supplier has no difficulty noticing, and billing me for, the power draw of my ceiling smoke detectors. They consume well under a watt each and probably cost me a cent or two per year to run. But they _do_ use power and therfore consume some fuel. Theo
From: Theo Bekkers on 15 Feb 2007 18:13
Knobdoodle wrote: > RON now eh? [chortle] Who's this Ron bloke and which side of the argument is he on? I must have him kill-filed as being a mate of Hammo's. Theo |