From: Ace on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:57:30 -0000, "Dave Emerson"
<Dave_dot_Emerson(a)LineOne.net> wrote:

>
>"Mark Olson" <olsonm(a)tiny.invalid> wrote in message
>news:ss-dnfMW-LlBnOHWnZ2dnUVZ_sBi4p2d(a)posted.visi...
>> Beav wrote:
>>
>>> Air passages weren't designed to contain water. I'll stick to carb
>>> cleaner thanks ...
>>>
>>> They use water in ultra sonic cleaning systems and if a carb refuses to
>>> behave after being "cleaned" by other methods, ultra sonic cleaning is
>>> used as it's regarded s *the* most effective solution.
>>
>> Are you sure which side of this argument you are actually on?
>
>The quoting goes all wrong when replying to messages from Google groups.
>
>Something to do with the char-set?

Something to do with a user who's not competent or caring enough to
check.

From: Mark Olson on
Dave Emerson wrote:
> "Mark Olson" <olsonm(a)tiny.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ss-dnfMW-LlBnOHWnZ2dnUVZ_sBi4p2d(a)posted.visi...
>> Beav wrote:
>>
>>> Air passages weren't designed to contain water. I'll stick to carb
>>> cleaner thanks ...
>>>
>>> They use water in ultra sonic cleaning systems and if a carb refuses to
>>> behave after being "cleaned" by other methods, ultra sonic cleaning is
>>> used as it's regarded s *the* most effective solution.
>> Are you sure which side of this argument you are actually on?
>
> The quoting goes all wrong when replying to messages from Google groups.

Yes, I know.

> Something to do with the char-set?

I'm pretty sure the problem isn't software-related, there are plenty of
ways to address it but the obstacle in this case is gray and squishy.







From: Pip on
Ace wrote:

> Something to do with a user who's not competent or caring enough to
> check.

"Never attribute to malice something that could be explained by
stupidity".

--
Pip: B12
From: Champ on
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:57:30 -0000, "Dave Emerson"
<Dave_dot_Emerson(a)LineOne.net> wrote:

>
>"Mark Olson" <olsonm(a)tiny.invalid> wrote in message
>news:ss-dnfMW-LlBnOHWnZ2dnUVZ_sBi4p2d(a)posted.visi...
>> Beav wrote:
>>
>>> Air passages weren't designed to contain water. I'll stick to carb
>>> cleaner thanks ...
>>>
>>> They use water in ultra sonic cleaning systems and if a carb refuses to
>>> behave after being "cleaned" by other methods, ultra sonic cleaning is
>>> used as it's regarded s *the* most effective solution.
>>
>> Are you sure which side of this argument you are actually on?

>The quoting goes all wrong when replying to messages from Google groups.

No, it's just Beav. He's a serial offender
--
Champ
We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.
ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo
neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Pip on
Beav wrote:

>
> "darsy" <darsyx(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2a15e0bb-e42a-4565-9659-26b10f1d2e01(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com
> ... On Feb 16, 6:45 pm, Champ <n...(a)champ.org.uk> wrote:
> > From another place:
> >
> > http://www.aircooledtech.com/tools-on-the-cheap/soda_blaster/
>
> alternatively, move forward to the 1980s and use vehicles with FI[1].
>
> Or to put it another way... Move to a less pikey fuel system.

Moving to a less pikey newsreader would probably help.

--
Pip: B12