Spodefest is nearing
in [ATVs]
|
From: Mike Baxter on 23 Jul 2010 22:36 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT), HellSickle <jdeeney(a)comcast.net> wrote: >I have a small confession to make. Every time I see the title to >this thread I think of this scene: > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcZ9ku_wInw > >"Spodefest is a n*****" That movie sits nicely in the rack next to my TV along with several other non-PC movies. Mike Baxter
From: Rowdy on 24 Jul 2010 08:18 Am 22.07.2010 05:48, schrieb Dean H: > The day after Zeus drives a bolt of lightning through my ex wife. > > Or next year. Isn't one of the advantages of a wife becomming an ex wife that one can attend as many spodefest as he wishes? Rowdy
From: scrape on 24 Jul 2010 08:46 On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:18:57 +0200, Rowdy <thy-no(a)hottmail.com> wrote: >Am 22.07.2010 05:48, schrieb Dean H: >> The day after Zeus drives a bolt of lightning through my ex wife. >> >> Or next year. > >Isn't one of the advantages of a wife becomming an ex wife >that one can attend as many spodefest as he wishes? Not when some lawyer finds a way for her to dictate how you get to use your money.
From: Rowdy on 24 Jul 2010 09:09 Am 24.07.2010 14:46, schrieb scrape: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:18:57 +0200, Rowdy<thy-no(a)hottmail.com> wrote: >> Isn't one of the advantages of a wife becomming an ex wife >> that one can attend as many spodefest as he wishes? > > Not when some lawyer finds a way for her to dictate how you get to use > your money. Huh? Normally they fight for who gets what and how much. The judge picks one of those options, and from then on she gets X % of his income. It news to me that the judge can restrict what he does with the 100-X % of his income. On what grounds should such severe interference with his life be justifiable, as long as she gets "her" monthly X % ? Rowdy
From: scrape on 24 Jul 2010 23:30
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:09:56 +0200, Rowdy <thy-no(a)hottmail.com> wrote: >Am 24.07.2010 14:46, schrieb scrape: >> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:18:57 +0200, Rowdy<thy-no(a)hottmail.com> wrote: >>> Isn't one of the advantages of a wife becomming an ex wife >>> that one can attend as many spodefest as he wishes? >> >> Not when some lawyer finds a way for her to dictate how you get to use >> your money. > >Huh? Normally they fight for who gets what and how much. The judge >picks one of those options, and from then on she gets X % of his income. >It news to me that the judge can restrict what he does with the 100-X % >of his income. On what grounds should such severe interference with his >life be justifiable, as long as she gets "her" monthly X % ? The lawyers aren't necessarily trying to find a way to restrict what's done with what's left after they pick the bones clean, but, well, you know. |