The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Henry on 6 Jan 2007 08:57 Al Dykes wrote: > Henry <9-11(a)treason.gov> wrote: >> Al Dykes wrote: >>> Henry <impeachbush(a)treason.gov> wrote: >>>> It's a fact that there were no floors in the rubble pile, and >>>> it's a fact that the concrete was pulverized into a fine powder >>>> and spread all over Manhattan. There was no "pancaking" of >>>> floors. >>> The floors were, ISTR, three inch thick slabs with no reinforcing bar. >>> Any flexing and stress made them break up. >> Four inches thick, and they did not just break up, they >> were pulverized into fine powder. > Why does the fact that the thin floors were turned to rubble in the > collapse require the use of explosives to explain? Try not to use the > owrds "must" or "can't". Please learn how to read and think. The floors were pulverized into fine dust, not rubble. <link restored because we can't let terrorists or their apologists hide the truth> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html -- http://911research.wtc7.net Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
From: Henry on 6 Jan 2007 08:57 Al Dykes wrote: > Henry <9-11(a)treason.gov> wrote: >> That would break it into chunks, not fine powder. There were no >> broken up concrete floors in the rubble. They were spread all over >> Manhattan in a fine powder. Windows in buildings hundreds of feet >> away were blown out by force of the shock waves. Hundreds of small >> fragments of human bones were found on the roof of the Deutsche Bank >> Building, which is hundreds of feet away from the nearest tower. How >> could "pancaking" cause bodies in the towers to explode into small >> pieces and be thrown hundreds of feet? Shouldn't they have been crushed >> between the floors? > "all over manhattan"? No. The finely pulverized concrete was most definitely dispersed all over Manhattan. Your desperate denial of hard evidence is comical. Hence the thread title... http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.st911.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
From: Bully on 6 Jan 2007 11:22 Henry wrote: Stop changing your name thing, you tosser. -- Bully Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
From: Henry on 7 Jan 2007 17:11 Al Dykes wrote: > Henry <warcrimes(a)lies.gov> wrote: >> Please learn how to read and think. The floors were pulverized >> into fine dust, not rubble. >> <link restored because we can't let terrorists or their apologists >> hide the truth> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/concrete.html > The headline from that page; > Concrete Pulverization > Twin Towers' Concrete Turned to Dust in Mid-Air > A striking feature of the Twin Towers' destruction was the > pulverization of most of the concrete into gravel and dust before > it hit the ground. This is evident from the explosive mushrooming > of > And so what? How does this require the use of explosives. "Pancaking" couldn't convert the concrete floors to powder. That requires demolition charges. That's explained on the page you opened, too. Your pancake theory, had it been possible, would have resulted in a stack of 100 plus floor of broken up concrete. In fact, there was a crater, not a rubble pile. A crater of glowing steel beams and molten metal that was quickly hauled away without failure analysis. Tell us how hundreds of human bone fragments, many only 1/16th of an inch long, found their way to the roof of a building hundreds of feet from the towers. If your thoroughly debunked and physically impossible "pancake" theory was true, the bodies would have been crushed between the floors, not blown to tiny pieces and thrown hundreds of feet. Also, tell us why the floors that neatly pancaked on top of one another were not in the rubble pile? -- http://911research.wtc7.net Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
From: Rob Kleinschmidt on 8 Jan 2007 03:28
Henry wrote: > "Pancaking" couldn't convert the concrete floors to powder. > That requires demolition charges. You bring down a building by removing vertical columns and walls, right ? Please explain why anyone attempting to demolish a building would want to blow up the concrete floors. That doesn't strike you as a tad implausible ? If you're unsure of the answer, perhaps somebody else in your truth movement can explain why blowing up floors would serve any useful purpose. I'm pretty sure they don't do this on any normal demolition jobs. I'll bet it was to destroy the evidence. :-) |