The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Road Glidin' Don on 1 Feb 2007 22:58 On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:33:36 -0500, Henry <treason(a)bush.gov> wrote: >I guess I fucked up -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: Henry on 5 Feb 2007 20:13 BrianNZ wrote: > Rather than waffle on trying to troll old posts, just keep to your > points with Mitchell Jones. It's making for interesting reading and > there's a few points he's brought to your attention that you > haven't responded to. Too bad I missed them. Can you repost them so I can take a look and reply? -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
From: Road Glidin' Don on 6 Feb 2007 00:49 On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:11:24 -0500, Henry <treason(a)bush.gov> wrote: >I guess I fucked up -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: Mitchell Jones on 6 Feb 2007 14:40 In article <45ca16c0.44222839(a)shawnews.ed.shawcable.net>, langkd_NO_SPAM(a)shaw.ca (Road Glidin' Don) wrote: > On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:11:24 -0500, Henry <treason(a)bush.gov> wrote: > > >I guess I fucked up > > -- > > Home page: http://xidos.ca ***{On what group did he say that? He didn't say it say it on the group I am reading (sci.physics) as far as I can tell. --MJ}*** ***************************************************************** If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility that you are in my killfile. --MJ
From: Henry on 6 Feb 2007 20:10
Mitchell Jones wrote: > Henry <9-11(a)treason.gov> wrote: > ***{In the films I have seen, everything moved down. Nothing moved up. > If you have a reference to a film showing the near side moving up, > please post the link. --MJ}*** Looking at the videos, it does appear that as the upper block tilts, it also moves down. But the question remains, why is the undamaged side exploding and disintegrating at the same rate as the damaged side with all the weight on it? BTW, the video titled "South Tower destruction from south" on this page: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/videos/index.html is quite telling, because it shows the demolition wave traveling down the side of the tower out pacing the debris that's falling beside it. Needless to say, any gravity forced collapse would have to be much slower than free fall speed because of all the resistance it would encounter, but the explosions traveling down the side of the tower are faster than free fall. Obviously, that could only be achieved by timing of the explosives. -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm |