The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Road Glidin' Don on 16 Feb 2007 20:42 On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:35:54 -0600, Mitchell Jones <mjones(a)21cenlogic.com> wrote: <snip> >This comment is not for Henry, but for others who may find >themselves reading Henry: you are on your own, because I am really, >really done arguing with him this time. (Honest! :-) Therefore I suggest >that you trust nothing he says. <snip> Hmmm. What do *you* hope to accomplish by such an ad hominem attack? ;) -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: Road Glidin' Don on 17 Feb 2007 03:01 On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:26:38 -0600, Mitchell Jones <mjones(a)21cenlogic.com> wrote: <snip> >Anyway, this has been very interesting. I can see, in particular, the >momentum inexorably building for a flame war between Henry and myself, >and I can see that you guys are sitting back in your chairs, big grins >on your faces, with popcorn already made, ready to watch it happen. It's >what you all predicted and expected, and now you are about to be proven >right. He will escalate into the red zone, and I will be compelled to >follow, without limit. Pretty soon we'll both be behaving like >jackasses, right? > >Since I'm predestined to behave like a jackass, I guess I'll make some >popcorn myself, and sit back to await the inevitable. :-( Hey, if you're willing, I vote for continuing, Mitchell. Anything that forces Henry to waste yet more of his life on this is justified punishment for his vainness. At least you're getting it in perspective now. Around here, he's just a side show feature some of us prod occasionally for amusement - we've kept him on this same track, day-in, day-out, for years. -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: P.Roehling on 17 Feb 2007 03:54 "Mitchell Jones" <mjones(a)21cenlogic.com> wrote > Since I'm predestined to behave like a jackass, I guess I'll make some > popcorn myself, and sit back to await the inevitable. :-( > > Either that, or I'll killfile the whole thread. > > I'll leave it to you guys to guess what I decided. :-) You may not ride a motorcycle, Mitchell, but we'll miss your shining face around here anyway. Pete
From: P.Roehling on 17 Feb 2007 04:08 "Road Glidin' Don" <langkd_NO_SPAM(a)shaw.ca> wrote >> >>Since I'm predestined to behave like a jackass, I guess I'll make some >>popcorn myself, and sit back to await the inevitable. :-( > > Hey, if you're willing, I vote for continuing, Mitchell. Anything > that forces Henry to waste yet more of his life on this is justified > punishment for his vainness. > > At least you're getting it in perspective now. Around here, he's just > a side show feature some of us prod occasionally for amusement - we've > kept him on this same track, day-in, day-out, for years. Hey, Hen3ry's the one who chose to smoke on the Hindenburg. He's got nobody but himself to blame for going down in flames.
From: Henry on 17 Feb 2007 08:27
BrianNZ wrote: > Rather than waffle on trying to troll old posts, just keep to your > points with Mitchell Jones. It's making for interesting reading and > there's a few points he's brought to your attention that you > haven't responded to. Too bad I missed them. Can you repost them so I can take a look and reply? This is the fourth time you were asked, by the way. Apparently, those interesting points are as hard to find as a photo of the gale force wind driven core melting raging infernos in the towers. <g> Doesn't it seem weird to write a post asking someone to respond to a few interesting points, but when they ask you which points, you just wonder off? Most folks would consider that to be rather bizarre behavior. Here's an example of a point MJ made that I think is highly speculative and most likely impossible. He claimed that spilled fuel from the jets burned inside the cores of the towers just as hot as an oil fired forge, even melting the massive core box columns. Those box columns measured about 4 feet by 3 feet each and had 5 inch thick walls. The forge not only burns fuel that has been vaporized and the air fuel mixture optimized, but oxygen is forced in under pressure. A reasonably intelligent, logical person would ask how that could have been duplicated inside the towers by spilled kerosene that may have run down the sides of some of the steel columns. The answer of course, is that it can't possibly be duplicated for reasons so obvious that I won't insult your intelligence by explaining them. That claim is typical of the wild speculation, implausible, and and even impossible scenarios we see from followers of the "official" conspiracy theory. They must know it's all bullshit, or they wouldn't take off running when they're asked very clear, reasonable, and logical questions. <g> -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm |