The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Road Glidin' Don on 3 Mar 2007 11:19 On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:30:33 -0500, Henry <9-11(a)insidejob.guv> wrote: >Road Glidin' Don wrote: > >> Well, that was real nice. Henry, there's no doubt I levelled some >> pretty hard criticism at you, > > When I challenge you to address the hard evidence that exposes >your magic fire conspiracy theory as a comically impossible fairy >tale, and you can only talk about my education or lie about my >personal life, that doesn't criticize me or make me look bad - it >makes you look weak minded and pathetic, and your kook theory >indefensible. You fucked up again. Depends on how you look at it. I write about the things that *I* find interesting or worthwhile - which is the same thing you are free to do. If there was a Net Cop who wouldn't let me write about anything except the narrow subject you insist on (a topic that's long-finished, in my opinion), I wouldn't post. But if something said touches on a topic I think is thought provoking, then I'll write about that. Using the words you chose to define your success (and the words you did not choose), I wrote a barbed, little critique about the emptiness and short-sightedness of measuring one's self worth in terms of money. You could have reacted differently. You could have countered, saying some of that might apply if that was truly how you defined your life. And then you could have gone on to show me - by adding to your description of success - that the conclusions I drew from your words were not justified. That would be a worthwhile discussion about life and the varying approaches to living. I'm interested in a wide variety of things (maybe the result of a more extensive, liberal education than you <jab, jab>). You seem to live in a very narrow, single-subject world. The way I see it, my veering off into broader subjects is probably good for you. If you don't like it, so be it - I don't find your subject worthwhile either and nobody is in charge here, as far as I can see. So, if I do write, I'll write about the subjects that strike me as interesting. You go ahead and engage in all the "you're incapable" childish insults you like, if it makes you feel good. I haven't been impressed by chants like that since grade 6. But, in the future - regardless of how much your twisted thought process has convinced you that I deserve it - resist your urge to further your position by making crude, degrading statements about my wife from now on. No matter how you cut it, things like that have a potential to wreak a devastating effect on certain, innocent people who have done nothing to deserve it - something you might understand if you have children someday. The original trick played was cruel enough. You should be ashamed of your efforts to perpetuate and benefit from it. > Since you're incapable of defending your kook theory with facts, >logic, or evidence, perhaps you should just sit back, read, and >hopefully learn something. Maybe later you'll be able to address >the facts. <snip> Well, there you go again on your pet subject. Not interested. Get it? No, I didn't think so... -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: Road Glidin' Don on 5 Mar 2007 20:58 On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:41:11 -0500, Henry <911(a)insidejob.gov> wrote: >Road Glidin' Don wrote: >> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:30:33 -0500, Henry <9-11(a)insidejob.guv> wrote: >>> Road Glidin' Don wrote: > >>>> Well, that was real nice. Henry, there's no doubt I levelled some >>>> pretty hard criticism at you, > >>> When I challenge you to address the hard evidence that exposes >>> your magic fire conspiracy theory as a comically impossible fairy >>> tale, and you can only talk about my education or lie about my >>> personal life, that doesn't criticize me or make me look bad - it >>> makes you look weak minded and pathetic, and your kook theory >>> indefensible. You fucked up again. > >> Depends on how you look at it. I write about the things that *I* find >> interesting or worthwhile - > > Kinda weird that the subject you seem to find interesting >and worthwhile is something about which you know little to >nothing - my personal life. Even more bizarre is that you chose >to make yourself look like a fool by lying about it. That's not >writing about something you find interesting and worthwhile - that's >just you venting your humiliation and frustration over having your >silly drivel, weak mindedness, and cowardice exposed. Quite the oh-so-righteous, over-reaction from someone who did exactly the same to the person he now complains to. In light of that, you surely couldn't now object to me using *your* excuse, could you? Remember (on Sept. 3, 2006) you saying: "I hope you find a rewarding career someday, Don. I bet your lack of a decent job a is a big part of the anger and hostility you've displayed here over the years." To which I replied (on Sept. 7): "Hey, don't worry about me, Henry. How you stoop to use unrelated misfortunes of someone's past (real or imagined) to excuse your petty vindictiveness says much more about you than it ever can about me. My career and income have been perfectly fine for a long time now and the future is even brighter." To which you responded (proving you had read it). (in the "Moderated motorcycle NGs" thread) So the record is quite clear, Henry. You tried this same false accusation back then. You just tried it again now, after knowing your are incorrect - removing all doubt that you are lying. And now, Henry, for your excuse, which I'm sure you won't mind me handing back to you as your answer - since you yourself felt it was sufficient at the time: "Asking you if you've found a job isn't deliberately lying about you or making false accusations." (yep, this is your excuse) Unfortunately, your own words (earlier) still undo you: "Perhaps if you had a job, you' find better uses for your time than picking fights and lying and obsessing about your gainfully employed betters on usenet...." (you again) Seems like you're doing a little more than just asking there... So, Henry, if that last quote of yours was just you "asking", then I was just "asking" too. That context makes your hyperventilated, over-reaction look quite silly and self indulgent. Or is it bizarre that "you chose to make yourself look like a fool by lying about it. That's not writing about something you find interesting and worthwhile - that's just you venting your humiliation and frustration over having your silly drivel, weak mindedness, and cowardice exposed." <veeeeery big grin> -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: BrianNZ on 5 Mar 2007 21:16 Road Glidin' Don wrote: > > <veeeeery big grin> > bwaaahahahaha......make that 2 veeeeery big grins! It's like the seagulls have dropped their loads when the Henry train pulls into a thread.
From: Road Glidin' Don on 5 Mar 2007 22:26 On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:16:08 +1300, BrianNZ <brian(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote: >It's like the seagulls have dropped their loads when the Henry train >pulls into a thread. Bulls eye. Mine dented his tin foil hat. -- Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: P.Roehling on 6 Mar 2007 00:28
"Road Glidin' Don" <langkd_NO_SPAM(a)shaw.ca> wrote > >>It's like the seagulls have dropped their loads when the Henry train >>pulls into a thread. > > Bulls eye. Mine dented his tin foil hat. But there is nothing any of us can say about Hen3ry that makes him look worse than his own posts. |