From: Yeebok on
Henry wrote:
> Road Glidin' Don wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:53:45 -0500, Henry <treason(a)bush.gov> wrote:
>
>> Quite honestly, your reputation for rational argument here is in such
>> tatters
>
> If that were true, someone would be able to quote something I
> wrote that isn't rational. But of course, you're not able do that,
> and we =know= how much you wish you could. <g> You are quite clearly
> and quite =simply= lying and obsessing again. The proof that you are
> lying, is that you will again demonstrate you pitiful inability to
> meeting the challenge to back you rant, and quote something I've written
> that's irrational.
> I'll probably repost this challenge a few times just to drive the
> point home. Where the events of 9-11-01 are concerned, you present
> yourself as an ignorant, timid fool with no credibility or integrity.
> You =simply= rant, lie, run, and hide.
>

You're saying (sorry, implying) that :
your incessant, obsessive posts are rational ..
that a normal person would do same ..
That having a signature of about 30 lines is rational..
13 consecutive posts, mainly identical is rational..
ignoring my magic plastic spoon theory is rational ..
That 99% of the people here disagree with you almost vehemently entirely
is rational ..

That about sum it up ? Get a magic spoon OK ? It'll magic itself better
in no time.
From: Henry on
BrianNZ wrote:
> Road Glidin' Don wrote:

>> <veeeeery big grin>

> bwaaahahahaha......make that 2 veeeeery big grins!

Make it three. <VBG> Hey, Did you boys see the post where Petie
"I'm not psychotic at all" Roehling posted a link ridiculing
his own conspiracy theory? I'll quote it for our viewing pleasure.



TroytheTroll wrote:
> "P. "I'm not psychotic at all" Roehling" wrote

>> Or, better yet,

>> http://www.crank.net/911.html

>> Enjoy!

> How DARE you notice that 9-11 nutjobs are finally being recognized
> for what they are!! Its was an AMS secret!!

Hey Toy, Petie "I'm not psychotic at all" Roehling's link says
that you and he are the nut jobs, and that your kooky conspiracy
theory is as hair brained as you. Funny thing is, you don't even
realize it, 'cause neither one of you imbeciles can read or think.
<vbg>


From psycho Petie's link:

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/linkscopy/DCTPFA911.html

Debunking Conspiracy Theorists Paranoid Fantasies About Sept 11
Distract From the Real Issues

by Gerard Holmgren, 9 January 2003

Copyright Gerard Holmgren. Jan 9 2003.
This work may be freely copied and distributed without permission as
long as it not for commercial use. Please include the author's name, the
web address where you found it and the copyright notice.
From: EcoNews Service <econews(a)ecologynews.com>
Date: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:05 PM


"Astute observers of history are aware that for every notable event
there will usually be at least one, often several wild conspiracy
theories which spring up around it. "The CIA killed Hendrix" "The Pope
had John Lennon murdered", "Hitler was half Werewolf", "Space aliens
replaced Nixon with a clone", etc, etc. The bigger the event, the more
ridiculous and more numerous are the fanciful rantings which circulate
in relation to it.

So its hardly surprising that the events of Sept 11 2001 have spawned
their fair share of these ludicrous fairy tales. And as always, there is
-- sadly -- a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to
lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis. One
of the wilder stories circulating about Sept 11, and one that has
attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs is that
it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an
evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other
than that they "hate our freedoms."

Never a group of people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of
this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of
delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage
across the internet and the media to the extent that a number of
otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell.

Normally I don't even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect
that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational
analysis, in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such
silly conspiracy theories. These crackpots even contend that the
extremist Bush regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in
organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if it had been able.

Blindly ignoring the stand down of the US air-force, the insider trading
on airline stocks -- linked to the CIA, the complicit behavior of Bush
on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the
firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented
proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, the conspiracy
theorists stick doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers
somehow managing to commandeer 4 planes simultaneously and fly them
around US airspace for nearly 2 hours, crashing them into important
buildings, without the US intelligence services having any idea that it
was coming, and without the Air Force knowing what to do. The huge
difficulties with such a stupid story force them to invent even more
preposterous stories to distract from its core silliness, and thus the
tale has escalated into a mythic fantasy of truly gargantuan proportions."







--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://www.911truth.org



Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
From: Road Glidin' Don on
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:16:33 -0500, Henry <911(a)insidejob.gov> wrote:

>BrianNZ wrote:
>> Road Glidin' Don wrote:
>
>>> <veeeeery big grin>
>
>> bwaaahahahaha......make that 2 veeeeery big grins!
>
> Make it three. <VBG> Hey, Did you boys see the post where Petie
>"I'm not psychotic at all" Roehling posted a link ridiculing
>his own conspiracy theory? I'll quote it for our viewing pleasure.

Wouldn't it be better to bring that with one of your friends here?

Sucks, doesn't it?

--

Home page: http://xidos.ca
From: Henry on
Road Glidin' Don wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:41:11 -0500, Henry <911(a)insidejob.gov> wrote:

> Quite the oh-so-righteous, over-reaction from someone who did exactly
> the same to the person he now complains to.

Well, you are over reacting, but your actions aren't the same as
mine.
I talk about 9-11 and it's global consequences, and I do so honestly
and accurately. That's why you're incapable of challenging the hard
evidence I've posted, or supporting your comical conspiracy theory
with any facts, references or logic. So you resort to obsessing about
me and lying about my personal life. See the difference?

> "Perhaps if you had a job, you' find better uses for your time than
> picking fights and lying and obsessing about your gainfully employed
> betters on usenet...." (you again)

You posted about your career woes here on several occasions, so why
are you still whining about a post that's months - maybe over a year
old? There's an old proverb - "People who live in glass houses shouldn't
throw stones." If you don't want the truth about your personal life
revealed, don't lie about mine....


--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://www.911truth.org



Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
From: P.Roehling on

"Road Glidin' Don" <langkd_NO_SPAM(a)shaw.ca> wrote

> Wouldn't it be better to bring that with one of your friends here?

Come now, Don; you should be above such wild accusations.

You know prefectly well that Hen3ry doesn't have any friends.