The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Henry on 3 Jan 2007 18:53 David Johnston wrote: > What's more if enough explosives has been > placed on the floors to pulverise the building would not have > collapsed in the first place. It would have disappeared in a giant > mushroom cloud as it's parts were flung away in all directiongs. Exactly like this: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html It's really amazing that some people can view these photos and try to claim that it's just steel bending and buckling from being over heated. You can see massive explosions blowing debris upward. We expect that sort of mindless idiocy from known psychotics like crazy Petie Roehling, but when seemingly sane folks do it, it's really weird. Maybe you hadn't yet seen the photos. Those are obviously not gravity driven collapses. They are clearly very violent and powerful explosions. -- http://911research.wtc7.net Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
From: kirb on 4 Jan 2007 10:10 Henry wrote: > David Johnston wrote: > > > What's more if enough explosives has been > > placed on the floors to pulverise the building would not have > > collapsed in the first place. It would have disappeared in a giant > > mushroom cloud as it's parts were flung away in all directiongs. > > Exactly like this: > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html > > It's really amazing that some people can view these photos and > try to claim that it's just steel bending and buckling from > being over heated. You can see massive explosions blowing debris > upward. We expect that sort of mindless idiocy from known > psychotics like crazy Petie Roehling, but when seemingly > sane folks do it, it's really weird. Maybe you hadn't yet seen > the photos. Those are obviously not gravity driven collapses. > They are clearly very violent and powerful explosions. You mean explosions that would have been heard all over Manhattan like a bomb going off? Sonic waves that could be heard for miles BEFORE the buildings came down? Why wasn't that reported or heard in the video of the buildings falling. These would have had to be MASSIVE explosions that would have been heard for miles....and were not. Kirb
From: Henry on 4 Jan 2007 19:15 kirb wrote: > Henry wrote: >> David Johnston wrote: >>> What's more if enough explosives has been >>> placed on the floors to pulverise the building would not have >>> collapsed in the first place. It would have disappeared in a giant >>> mushroom cloud as it's parts were flung away in all directiongs. >> Exactly like this: >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html >> It's really amazing that some people can view these photos and >> try to claim that it's just steel bending and buckling from >> being over heated. You can see massive explosions blowing debris >> upward. We expect that sort of mindless idiocy from known >> psychotics like crazy Petie Roehling, but when seemingly >> sane folks do it, it's really weird. Maybe you hadn't yet seen >> the photos. Those are obviously not gravity driven collapses. >> They are clearly very violent and powerful explosions. > You mean explosions that would have been heard all over Manhattan > like a bomb going off? Like this: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/mushrooming.html http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html Hey kirb, tell us how your magic fires and "pancaking" floors made human bodies explode into tiny fragments that were deposited on the roofs of buildings hundreds of feet away. Seems like they would have been crushed between floors if your comically impossible and thoroughly debunked magic fire and "pancake" theory was true. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/bodies.html Human Remains Discovered in 2006 About a year after the official program to identify victims had ended, more human remains turned up on top of the Deutsche Bank Building, which stands about 400 feet to the south of the location of the former South Tower. 7 � According to the Associated Press, more than 300 human bone fragments were recovered from the roof of the 43-story skyscraper as workers removed toxic debris in preparation for a floor-by-floor take-down of the building. Most of the fragments were less then 1/16th inch in length and were found in gravel raked to the sides of the roof of the building. The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation purchased the building and is planning to begin its deconstruction in June, after removal of toxic waste -- including asbestos, lead, and other materials deposited on it by the destruction of the Twin Towers. 8 � -- http://911research.wtc7.net Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
From: schoenfeld.one on 4 Jan 2007 20:11 Henry wrote: > David Johnston wrote: > > > What's more if enough explosives has been > > placed on the floors to pulverise the building would not have > > collapsed in the first place. It would have disappeared in a giant > > mushroom cloud as it's parts were flung away in all directiongs. > > Exactly like this: > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html > > It's really amazing that some people can view these photos and > try to claim that it's just steel bending and buckling from > being over heated. You can see massive explosions blowing debris > upward. We expect that sort of mindless idiocy from known > psychotics like crazy Petie Roehling, but when seemingly > sane folks do it, it's really weird. Maybe you hadn't yet seen > the photos. Those are obviously not gravity driven collapses. > They are clearly very violent and powerful explosions. What is more amazing, perhaps even shocking, is that almost all "physicists" believe the official account for the physics of WTC 1,2 and even 7. The "layman" can blame the "scientific establishment" for thier ignorance. But what excuse do these "physicists", proclaimed authorities over such issues, have? Academia is the new clergy, Einstein-worship the new religion, delusion the new science.
From: malibu on 4 Jan 2007 22:23
kirb wrote: > Henry wrote: > > David Johnston wrote: > > > > > What's more if enough explosives has been > > > placed on the floors to pulverise the building would not have > > > collapsed in the first place. It would have disappeared in a giant > > > mushroom cloud as it's parts were flung away in all directiongs. > > > > Exactly like this: > > > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp2.html > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html > > > > It's really amazing that some people can view these photos and > > try to claim that it's just steel bending and buckling from > > being over heated. You can see massive explosions blowing debris > > upward. We expect that sort of mindless idiocy from known > > psychotics like crazy Petie Roehling, but when seemingly > > sane folks do it, it's really weird. Maybe you hadn't yet seen > > the photos. Those are obviously not gravity driven collapses. > > They are clearly very violent and powerful explosions. > > You mean explosions that would have been heard all over Manhattan like > a bomb going off? Sonic waves that could be heard for miles BEFORE the > buildings came down? > > Why wasn't that reported or heard in the video of the buildings > falling. These would have had to be MASSIVE explosions that would have > been heard for miles....and were not. > > Kirb Yeah, they were. Seismic shocks were recorded at 3 on the Richter scale at *exactly* the same moment that both WTC1 and WTC2 *started* to collapse. NOT when they hit the ground- when they *started* to collapse. These are hard copy. Also. The firefighters that came to building one found *all* the ground floor windows blown out. They also encountered maintenance workers coming up from the basement in shock and reporting massive explosions in the basement levels. John |