From: Henry on
S'mee wrote:
> On May 19, 8:39 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:

> I read those years ago.

Read what, nut job? You fucked up your post again. You
do that every time you attempt to think and type in the
same day. <chuckle>



--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org


From: S'mee on
On May 19, 1:54 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:

Well nutjob, pick a link, they either LIE or use the facts to create a
lie. Something nutjobs like you are quiet good at...but what you fail
at is actual thought and bringing to bear knowledge and experience and
the ability to NOT bring preconcieved ideas into your thought. Sadly
that's becuase you are intellectually challenged and of a lower class
and not capable of doing any better.

From: Vito on
S'mee wrote:
> On May 18, 12:06 pm, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>> Henry wrote:
>>>> The cop was
>>>> a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison,
>>>> but the guy on the bike is screwed for life....
>>
>> Bwahahaha! God you do live in a dream world. The cop will never go to
>> prison.
>
> Oh? I suppose being convicted would obviate your response...which he
> was.

The cop was convicted of ?? and went to prison?? I missed that. Please
cite.


From: Twibil on
On May 19, 6:52 pm, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> But at the end of the day, the roads are public byways
> that we are granted a privilege to navigate.  

Whoops! I must have missed something. Exactly where does it say in
black and white that our government -*any* of our governments- may
"grant us the privilege" of being on a public byway?

I mean, you *do* understand that that entire concept is something
originally dreamed up by bureaucrats for the sake of their bureaucracy
-a blatant power grab- and that nothing like that is mentioned in any
of the documents that outline what US governments are allowed to do,
right?

The fact that our several governments have assumed that power unto
themselves without an iota of authority to do so, and that they've
repeated the "driving is a privilege" line so often that suckerbait
like you assume that it's not only true but always *has* been true,
doesn't mean that it's actually true.
From: saddlebag on
On May 20, 2:16 am, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 19, 6:52 pm, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > But at the end of the day, the roads are public byways
> > that we are granted a privilege to navigate.  
>
> Whoops!  I must have missed something.  Exactly where does it say in
> black and white that our government  -*any* of our governments-  may
> "grant us the privilege" of being on a public byway?
>
> I mean, you *do* understand that that entire concept is something
> originally dreamed up by bureaucrats for the sake of their bureaucracy
> -a blatant power grab- and that nothing like that is mentioned in any
> of the documents that outline what US governments are allowed to do,
> right?
>
> The fact that our several governments have assumed that power unto
> themselves without an iota of authority to do so, and that they've
> repeated the "driving is a privilege" line so often that suckerbait
> like you assume that it's not only true but always *has* been true,
> doesn't mean that it's actually true.

So you are implying that driving on a public road is a right
guaranteed you under law? That no matter how poorly you've performed
there or what disaster you may have created, you have an inalienable
right to get right back on and do your thing?

Let the good times roll...