This is really disturbing
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Latest mod to the 750SS "ultralight"
Next: Means, Motives, and Opportunities as Iarnbored makes HUGE stinking turd pile in newsgroups by hating peace and worshipping war criminals Bush and Cheney
From: Henry on 20 May 2010 10:55 saddlebag wrote: > So what time's the party start? > > BryanUT, will you be there to explain why he got the accountability he > deserved? Mikewhy, will you explain to us how he was too powerful to > be subjected to law? Henry, will you be there to tell us how he was in > on the 9/11 conspiracy with Bu$h? Actually, that was RGD's conspiracy theory, and it's at least as silly as his cave man conspiracy theory, so you'll have to ask him to "explain" it to ya. Good luck with that... ;-) -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Chuck Rhode on 20 May 2010 13:26 On Thu, 20 May 2010 02:51:38 -0700, saddlebag wrote: > On May 20, 2:16 am, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 19, 6:52 pm, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > But at the end of the day, the roads are public byways >> > that we are granted a privilege to navigate. -snip- >> The fact that our several governments have assumed that power unto >> themselves without an iota of authority to do so, and that they've >> repeated the "driving is a privilege" line so often that suckerbait >> like you assume that it's not only true but always *has* been true, >> doesn't mean that it's actually true. > So you are implying that driving on a public road is a right guaranteed > you under law? That no matter how poorly you've performed there or what > disaster you may have created, you have an inalienable right to get > right back on and do your thing? Well ... time was when local public roads *were public* and maintained by the public free for public use, as opposed to toll roads and bridges over and around choke points that were chartered on speculation by corporations for private gain. I don't think a lot has changed except that nowadays governments prefer to levy taxes and hire professional road builders rather than dun property owners for labor. The public (non-interstate) roads are still (more than historically) free to use (at least to bicyclists). Here's a 6MB glass-plate photo taken a century ago by my great-grandmother of work in progress around Pine Village, IN: o Cobb, Magnolia. "Thomason's Gravel Road Gang." Glass plate. [Pine Village, IN], [July 1909.] <http://www.LacusVeris.com/Snaps/Thomasons_Road_Gang_1.png>. Note farmer tans, child labor, and winter wheat or oats in the shock. The kid to the left down in front has a theatrical pose, which I attribute to my great-grandmother's influence. This was at the height of the Good Roads Movement: o "Good Roads Movement." _Wikipedia_. 8 May 2010. 20 May 2010 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_roads>. -- ... Be Seeing You, ... Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA ... Weather: http://LacusVeris.com/WX ... 0° — Wind Calm
From: Twibil on 20 May 2010 14:14 On May 20, 2:51 am, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > But at the end of the day, the roads are public byways > > > that we are granted a privilege to navigate. > > > Whoops! I must have missed something. Exactly where does it say in > > black and white that our government -*any* of our governments- may > > "grant us the privilege" of being on a public byway? > > >> > > The fact that our several governments have assumed that power unto > > themselves without an iota of authority to do so, and that they've > > repeated the "driving is a privilege" line so often that suckerbait > > like you assume that it's not only true but always *has* been true, > > doesn't mean that it's actually true. > > So you are implying that driving on a public road is a right > guaranteed you under law? That no matter how poorly you've performed > there or what disaster you may have created, you have an inalienable > right to get right back on and do your thing? And, as usual, Saddle just posts straw man arguments and ducks the question: "I mean, you *do* understand that that entire concept is something originally dreamed up by bureaucrats for the sake of their bureaucracy -a blatant power grab- and that nothing like that is mentioned in any of the documents that outline what US governments are allowed to do, right?" Right from square one you're trying to ignore the fact that according to it's *own rules* our government has no right to tell us that "driving is a privilege"; nor have they the power to "grant us the privilege" of being on a public byway, both of which things are entirely different from the government's right -nay, duty- to establish rules of the road for the safety of the general populance. Requiring that citizens pass a reasonable driving test to demonstrate their driving competency isn't unreasonable, nor is enforcing basic safety laws, but neither of those things equate to driving being a "privilege", or that the government has the power to "grant us" something. That you don't understand the difference between reasonable driving rules that pretty much everyone agrees are needed for safety reasons, and a government claiming the imperial right to grant us a privilege, tells us a lot about you.
From: S'mee on 20 May 2010 18:16 On May 20, 8:55 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > saddlebag wrote: > > So what time's the party start? > > > BryanUT, will you be there to explain why he got the accountability he > > deserved? Mikewhy, will you explain to us how he was too powerful to > > be subjected to law? Henry, will you be there to tell us how he was in > > on the 9/11 conspiracy with Bu$h? > > Actually, that was RGD's conspiracy theory, and it's at least as > silly as his cave man conspiracy theory, so you'll have to ask him > to "explain" it to ya. Good luck with that... ;-) > Lying again I see. You and the other losers of your cult are an embarssment to the other older more established cults...like marxisim, socialism, the religions spawned by some goat herder...and to many others to list.
From: S'mee on 20 May 2010 23:50
On May 20, 6:26 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: Heh, I can't help it...picking on delusional people like him is a hobby. Just like setting racists on fire is an avocation. 8^) I do it on the premise that some people deserve to be fucked with and abused. As for that irish priest I'm sure he was a relative of KK's and taught him all he needed to know about the boys...taking care of the balls is important. |