From: The Older Gentleman on 13 Aug 2008 02:17 Bill Miller. <jay-smith-1935(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 3:47 am, "TOG(a)Toil" <totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 12 Aug, 11:32, "Bill Miller." <jay-smith-1...(a)excite.com> wrote: And, BTW, you can save the "sweetie" routine for all your "boyfriends" and other butt-buddies. Find someone else who's interested in your homoerotic thoughts. I'm not. > > >> Ah, better and better. The homosexuality card. Frequently (and recently) played by Krusty and JS. You're in good company, dear. Next? > > If you recall Toggy Boy, you played the "homosexuality card" FIRST > when you called another male "sweetie." A term of endearment. > And then followed up with > your last statement, calling a male "dear." See above. > If you do twist that way, > enjoy yourself, no prob, just know who to call sweetie and dear and > when to keep your mouth shut. Save it for your butt buddies...I'm not > interested. Is that clkear enough for you old Toggy "boy?" > And you're copying JS's 'Toggy Boy'. Lovely. I've got you nicely trained. Erm, what's that phrase. Oh yes: Dance, boi. Now, let's return to your Webster's 'definition'. I see you've studiously ignored my posting to the effect that I think you made it up. Now I'm certain. You actually gave your own definition of the meaning of a phrase, and then claimed you'd got it from Webster's. You have *no idea* how much that makes me grin, and what a loser it makes you. You have simply lost all credibility. I've never known anyone to do that on Usenet; to claim they're right by using their own definition, and saying they got it from a dictionary. It's just brilliant. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XT600E Honda CB400F chateau dot murray at idnet dot com "What you're proposing to do will involve a lot of time and hassle for no tangible benefit."
From: Hans-Christian Becker on 13 Aug 2008 04:19 In article <39d91efc-ce79-4888-831e-52d14119d762(a)k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, Bill Miller. <jay-smith-1935(a)excite.com> wrote: >On Aug 12, 11:26�am, h...(a)fki030.fki.uu.se (Hans-Christian Becker) >wrote: >> Seriously, I would probably not go to a bar where someone would assault >> someone over being called `sweetie'. > >But you see, not all "men" like yourself enjoy being called "sweetie" >by other "men." Get the point, dim one from Sweden? I am not sure I would *enjoy* being called "sweetie" in a bar, but I am certain enough of my sexuality that I would not throw a hissy-fit over it. -- Dr. Hans-Christian Becker '96 VN750 SM5TLH KG6POK Uppsala, Sweden
From: . on 13 Aug 2008 03:21 On Aug 12, 11:17�pm, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: > I've never known anyone to do that on Usenet; to claim they're right by > using their own definition, and saying they got it from a dictionary. > It's just brilliant. Yawn... WTFGAS?
From: TOG on 13 Aug 2008 05:10 On 13 Aug, 08:21, "." <Rhiann...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 12, 11:17 pm, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older > > Gentleman) wrote: > > I've never known anyone to do that on Usenet; to claim they're right by > > using their own definition, and saying they got it from a dictionary. > > It's just brilliant. > > Yawn... > > WTFGAS? You don't find it amusing that someone claims their own made-up definition came from Websters? You don't think it rather destroys their position? <Thinks> No, you probably don't, given that you are equally inventive with your postings. Carry on, then.
From: TOG on 13 Aug 2008 05:13
On 13 Aug, 09:19, h...(a)fki030.fki.uu.se (Hans-Christian Becker) wrote: > In article <39d91efc-ce79-4888-831e-52d14119d...(a)k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > > > I am not sure I would *enjoy* being called "sweetie" in a bar, but I am > certain enough of my sexuality that I would not throw a hissy-fit over it. > I can think of circumstances when I would enjoy it, as in 'it would amuse and entertain me', but like you, I really don't care if someone starts hurling wild accusations of homosexuality at me because, like you, I am comfortable and certain enough of my own sexuality. I always feel that hurling such insults says more about the hurler...... It's fascinating that Krusty, JS and Bill are so alike in this respect. |