What goes through your head
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Spring Ride Report: TehachapI Pass & Environs.
Next: 9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March
From: Henry on 4 May 2010 14:13 Twitbull timidly chirped: > On May 4, 9:21 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> I'm not surprised it was the color scheme you recall. > And how many years did *you* teach at the college level, Mike? > Just askin' Hey twit, assuming that you're not lying again, and you really did teach, when students asked you to elaborate on something, did you respond by telling them that their mothers smoked crack and then quickly scurry under your desk to hide? Just askin', twit... <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: MikeWhy on 4 May 2010 16:52 S'mee wrote: > On May 4, 10:15 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> S'mee wrote: >>> On May 3, 10:55 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> Twibil wrote: >>>>> Might prove useful should you ever find yourself trapped in a >>>>> freshman physics class and have to sing your way out. >> >>>> Not to be a curmudgeon, but ye've misspelt "chemistry". >> >>> Your point being? You constantly mispeil Y as why...nobody gets on >>> ur kase aboot it. >> >> This is so third grade, Schiffner. Wouldn't you say? Mention that to >> Pete when you s'im, won't you? > > humourless git arenn't you... Humor lies with the beholder, Mr. Kettle. I missed 2 days of workouts, after overextending myself Saturday. That's as cheery at 10:00 AM as you'll get from me until that's set right. What's your excuse?
From: BryanUT on 4 May 2010 19:12 On May 1, 9:56 pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > when you ride? Well if it isn't high level theorics and metatheoric > these two songs tend to rumble about... > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGz7QgciPWs > > or maybe > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g266Uwp6ZnI > > rarely do I as annie to take a load off... Sorry for the late reply. 1. Thanks. 2. I didn't know you are a hippie.
From: S'mee on 5 May 2010 00:01 On May 4, 2:52 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > S'mee wrote: > > On May 4, 10:15 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> S'mee wrote: > >>> On May 3, 10:55 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> Twibil wrote: > >>>>> Might prove useful should you ever find yourself trapped in a > >>>>> freshman physics class and have to sing your way out. > > >>>> Not to be a curmudgeon, but ye've misspelt "chemistry". > > >>> Your point being? You constantly mispeil Y as why...nobody gets on > >>> ur kase aboot it. > > >> This is so third grade, Schiffner. Wouldn't you say? Mention that to > >> Pete when you s'im, won't you? > > > humourless git arenn't you... > > Humor lies with the beholder, Mr. Kettle. I missed 2 days of workouts, after > overextending myself Saturday. huh, when I still thought structured exercise was the way to go...overextending never stopped me. I might have gone lighter or spent more time on stretching but that was it. Then again I worked out regardless of serious injuries also...7 days of 2 to 6mile runs with an hours worth work out. In spite of a displace pelvis. So you get no sympathy, nothing personal I just got no sympathy for whinning about "it hurts" or "I strained somethign" hmmph. >That's as cheery at 10:00 AM as you'll get > from me until that's set right. at least you are honest about it...though frankly unless you need a doctor or a physical therapist I don't see what the problem is. > What's your excuse? I had a reason...you are making excuses.
From: Twibil on 5 May 2010 02:04
On May 4, 4:33 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > That really is pathetic, Pete. Give it up already, will ya? You have it so > completely bass ackwards, and it only makes it that much more obvious you > don't understand the first thing about what you just posted. Mike, you're an idiot. I don't know or care *why* you choose to behave like an idiot, but your repeated actions have demonstrated the fact that you *do; over and over. First time I recall seeing you post was several years ago when Timberwoof said that he didn't understand why a bike had to lean further and further to the inside of a turn as the gee force pulling it to the outside increased, and I tried to provide an explanation for him in non-technical terms. You immediately posted an accusation that I was spouting bullshit, and when you found out that I was actually a retired track instructor you said instead that I wasn't managing to explain things in a manner that you thought appropriate. When I challenged you to do a better job, you replied that it wasn't your job to do so but that *I* sure couldn't do it. Next you tried to start another flame war because you claimed that some rocks I'd described weren't big enough to be "boulders" according to you. The fact that the word "boulder" doesn't come with specs attached didn't keep you from trying to fan the argument with BS about the density of granite, yadda yadda yadda. A couple of years later you jumped onto something I'd said in a thread about cornering -again claiming that I was spouting BS- and when again confronted with my background as a track instructor you said something like "I have no way of knowing your background": which demonstrates that you were either lying through your teeth or that you'd actually forgotton what had passed between us before. And now you're doing your level and none-too-competent best to do the same thing all over again: try to start a flame war over something that's essentially meaningless: this time because you claim I confused Chemestry and Physics. *I* didn't confuse the two. But *you* seem to have confused me with someone over whom you've been appointed to stand in eternal judgement. Again: I don't know or care *why* you choose to behave like an idiot, but your repeated actions have demonstrated the fact that you *do*; and have done so over and over. |