From: The Older Gentleman on 1 Jan 2010 04:28 don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > Let me know the name and addy of the bar that refused to > serve you. On past experience, you wouldn't be able to find it and would then say it didn't exist. :-)) -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: The Older Gentleman on 1 Jan 2010 05:54 The Older Gentleman <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > ouyt > wrond Bloody brand new glasses are useless at close range, Should have ordered bifocals. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: The Older Gentleman on 1 Jan 2010 15:02 don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >Heh. I take it, then, that my assessment of your motives in demanding to > >see the article I wrote were spot on :-)) > > > >Do you still think it doesn't exist? > > Neil, it is clear from a swift reading of your comments, you > are a serial liar. You construct this extraordinary belief system and > subscribe to the view that if you repeat a lie often enough, you > convince people. Including yourself. <G> Well, I could now use this opportunity to display it, either electronic, or scanned paper, or both, but that would make you look unbearably ridiculous in this group. Your loss of face would be massive. It really, really would. But I've had a change of heart. I don't think it would be kind to do that to you. So I won't. You will appreciate this little bit of New Year charity one day. Have a good end to your New Year holiday and ride safe. One or two people might add their own comments here. Or might not. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: don (Calgary) on 1 Jan 2010 15:26 On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:02:36 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> >Heh. I take it, then, that my assessment of your motives in demanding to >> >see the article I wrote were spot on :-)) >> > >> >Do you still think it doesn't exist? >> >> Neil, it is clear from a swift reading of your comments, you >> are a serial liar. You construct this extraordinary belief system and >> subscribe to the view that if you repeat a lie often enough, you >> convince people. Including yourself. > ><G> > >Well, I could now use this opportunity to display it, either electronic, >or scanned paper, or both, but that would make you look unbearably >ridiculous in this group. > >Your loss of face would be massive. It really, really would. > >But I've had a change of heart. I don't think it would be kind to do >that to you. So I won't. > >You will appreciate this little bit of New Year charity one day. Have a >good end to your New Year holiday and ride safe. > >One or two people might add their own comments here. Or might not. I really don't care if you post the article or not. I made a request to read the article, very politely, and you refused. I am fine with that. I don't agree with your reasons, but it is your article. This is probably the fifth time I have explained this to you. Are you dense? Silly question. Your actions provide the answer. At no time did I ever demand to see it. That is just one more in a very long line of the lies you continue to post. I defy you to provide one quote of me demanding to see the article. At no time did I ever say the article didn't exist. That is another in a very long line of the lies you continue to post. I defy you to provide one quote of me saying the article didn't exist.. The fact you can't post one single quote supporting your most recent lines of bullshit makes you look unbearably ridiculous and underscores the lack of character you display here on a daily basis. I have noted the similarities between you and Moto, but Moto never deliberately lied about anyone in this group. Your continued deception is more in line with Bill Walker. If you were not around during those days, despite the facts, the archival records and all reasonable logic, Bill would continually post the same lies about several people in this group. Here you are doing the exact same thing. Enjoy the company you keep.
From: The Older Gentleman on 1 Jan 2010 16:53
don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > At no time did I ever demand to see it. That is just one more in a > very long line of the lies you continue to post. I defy you to provide > one quote of me demanding to see the article. A demand can still be a request and vice versa. You're Canadian - 'demander' is precisely the same word for demand and ask, in French. You asked to see it, and if you think the word 'demand' is too peremptory and smacks of an order, well, that wasn't my intention. "I would like to read this article." "If you have the time and the technology why not scan a copy of the article and post it. I would like to read it " "If you wouldn't mind, take a minute and copy and paste it to this forum." "I did want to read it." I held out a little olive branch there, and I'm holding it out again. You have expressed constant scepticism and you have implied a belief it doesn't exist - don't argue, now, you have. At this point, I repeat, I could make you look very, very silly and cause you a lot of embarrassment, but I won't, because I think this should end. And right now, if it ends, people will forget, in a while, that this episode happened. That's probably best. If, on the othr hand, I put the article up, at the end of this series of tirades from you, people will not forget for a long time. And I think it's best to leave them in suspense, so they don't know for certain one way or the other. Don't you? -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com |