From: CrazyCam on
hippo wrote:

<snip>

> Let's face it, you can be a hoon on a CT110. It's just a bit harder to
> sustain!

Give me five and a half grand and I'll sell you a Z50 that you can
_seriously_ hoon on.

regards,
CrazyCam
From: hippo on
CrazyCam wrote:
>
> hippo wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Let's face it, you can be a hoon on a CT110. It's just a bit harder to
> > sustain!
>
> Give me five and a half grand and I'll sell you a Z50 that you can
> _seriously_ hoon on.
>
> regards,
> CrazyCam
>
>

It'd probably do a rubbish job of carrying 600 newspapers though!

--
Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Zebee Johnstone on
In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 8 Feb 2010 05:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
hippo <am9obmhAc2hvYWwubmV0LmF1(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au> wrote:
> CrazyCam wrote:
>>
>> hippo wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > Let's face it, you can be a hoon on a CT110. It's just a bit harder to
>> > sustain!
>>
>> Give me five and a half grand and I'll sell you a Z50 that you can
>> _seriously_ hoon on.
>
> It'd probably do a rubbish job of carrying 600 newspapers though!

a bicycle trailer takes care of that.

As long as it's blue with yellow wheels.

Zebee
From: Andrew on
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:37:20 +1100, G-S wrote:
>
> People can be hoons without having 'sports bikes' just as people might
> not be hoons that have them.
>
> You I'd suggest are a mild hoon :)
>
>
> G-S

[Apoplectic noises] Mild? *Mild*? *MILD*!!!!!?

Next you'll be calling me beige :-(

--
Regards

Andrew
From: Andrew on
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:02:24 +1100, Nev.. wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:06:44 +1100, G-S wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>> If you buy one, it is because you want those two things, or you want
>>>> people to think you want those two things. Either way, you're a hoon.
>>>> Even if you never do a wheelie on your litre-class sports bike, and
>>>> you always stick to speed limits, you're still a hoon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I have to disagree with that.
>>>
>>> If a person never speeds, never wheelies, never breaks the law and
>>> rides a litre-class sports bike they are NOT a hoon.
>>>
>>> They no doubt want people to think they are a hoon (or the 2nd coming
>>> of M Doohan) but that doesn't make them one.
>>>
>>> At best they are FAIL at hoon...
>>>
>>>
>>> G-S
>>
>> Would you settle for 'wannabe' hoon? Nobody buys a sports bike for its
>> touring capability, or its baggage handling, or its ground clearance.
>> The fact that the rider doesn't behave like a hoon doesn't alter the
>> motivation for the purchase.
>
> Most of my motivation for buying highpowered sports bikes has been being
> comfort and laziness. Whats going to happen is you're going to have to
> define sports bike and hoon to within a very narrow definition and the
> real world will trip you over with diversity. So lets start by defining
> 'sportsbike'.
>
> Nev..
> '08 DL1000K8'

OK. Let's start with 'The Most Sporting Bike Class Defined By The
Manufacturer'. For example, Kawasaki make bikes they classify as 'Sport'
and 'Supersport'. We take the 'Supersport' category and we get the ZX-6R
Ninja, the ZX-10R Ninja and the ZX-14. OK, Suzuki next. They have bikes
they classify as 'Sport / Sport Touring' and 'Supersport'. We take the
'Supersport' category and we get the GSX-R600, the GSX-R750, the GSX-
R1000 and the Hayabusa.

I'm happy with all of those (actually, I really would be). Want to try
Ducati? They have categories called 'SportClassic' and 'Superbike'. And
if you do the obvious and select 'Superbike', you get the 848, 1098R,
1198 and 1198S.

I could go on but I think Nev.. is snoring. Anyone interested in offering
a contradictory example?

--
Regards

Andrew