From: Diogenes on
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:24:09 +1100, CrazyCam
<CrazyCam(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>Diogenes wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> What they WON'T do is stop being hoons and/or actually start
>> denouncing hoons for the stain on the motorcycling community that they
>> are. And the main reason for this is that by and large they ARE the
>> motorcycling community.
>
>Hang on there, Gerry!
>
>I just noticed this comment.
>
>I don't mind denouncing hoons and hoonery, but I am not giving up my
>rights to an occasional hoon myself.

No worries there, Cam. Just as long as you then also take
responsibility for being part of the problem which led to the lower
speed limits.

>After all, what's the point of having a motorcycle if you can't have the
>odd wee quiet hoon? :-)

Exactly! It's the hypocrisy of then complaining about the lower speed
limits which is what I'm pointing to here. ;-)


=================

Onya bike

Gerry
From: theo on
On Feb 3, 4:04 pm, Diogenes <cy...(a)society.sux.ok> wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:59:27 +1100, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote:

> >I don't really think I'm part of the supersports rider demographic
> >you're making me out to be (and nor to be honest are any of the regulars
> >I've met from this newsgroup).
>
> I think an _intelligent_ reader would have deduced that I was not not
> saying that you, personally, were a hoon.  Go back and do Engish
> Comprehension 101 _again_, will you, please, there's a good lad...

Are you saying Geoff inferred? I thought you implied.

Theo
From: Diogenes on
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:09:46 -0800 (PST), theo
<theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>On Feb 3, 4:04�pm, Diogenes <cy...(a)society.sux.ok> wrote:
>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:59:27 +1100, G-S <ge...(a)castbus.com.au> wrote:
>
>> >I don't really think I'm part of the supersports rider demographic
>> >you're making me out to be (and nor to be honest are any of the regulars
>> >I've met from this newsgroup).
>>
>> I think an _intelligent_ reader would have deduced that I was not not
>> saying that you, personally, were a hoon. �Go back and do Engish
>> Comprehension 101 _again_, will you, please, there's a good lad...
>
>Are you saying Geoff inferred? I thought you implied.

Geoff WAS inferring. I was NOT implying he, personally, was a hoon,
and you, GO AWAY !!! ;-)

=================

Onya bike

Gerry
From: Lars Chance on
theo wrote:

> Good Lord Kevin. I can count the number of times I've nudged 200 on
> the fingers of one hand.
>
I've done it lots of times; only once on public roads though.
(I was egged-on!)

--
Elsie.
From: theo on
On Feb 3, 4:14 pm, Diogenes <cy...(a)society.sux.ok> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:09:46 -0800 (PST), theo wrote:
> >On Feb 3, 4:04 pm, Diogenes <cy...(a)society.sux.ok> wrote:

> >> I think an _intelligent_ reader would have deduced that I was not not
> >> saying that you, personally, were a hoon.  Go back and do Engish
> >> Comprehension 101 _again_, will you, please, there's a good lad...
>
> >Are you saying Geoff inferred? I thought you implied.
>
> Geoff WAS inferring.  I was NOT implying he, personally, was a hoon,
> and you, GO AWAY !!!  ;-)

You just failed English Comprehension 101 Gerry. "I thought you
implied" translates to "I inferred". :-)

Theo